tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post1559148688393005365..comments2024-03-28T00:17:55.823+00:00Comments on Bruce Charlton's Notions: Not even trying - the corruption of real scienceBruce Charltonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09615189090601688535noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post-9498282372716060512012-01-30T05:17:06.845+00:002012-01-30T05:17:06.845+00:00@Al - that's not part of the argument - althou...@Al - that's not part of the argument - although I regard Bayesian methods as a kind of parody of science.Bruce Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09615189090601688535noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post-26631439157180836502012-01-29T22:41:33.129+00:002012-01-29T22:41:33.129+00:00Dr Charlton,
One thing that came to mind when I r...Dr Charlton,<br /><br />One thing that came to mind when I read the title of your book. Do you see a connection between the wide-spread use of Bayesian methods and the current state of science?Alnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post-56737153952046174392012-01-28T06:14:30.862+00:002012-01-28T06:14:30.862+00:00@Chuckles - yes, that's right. E-mail me.@Chuckles - yes, that's right. E-mail me.Bruce Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09615189090601688535noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post-15022857010832282492012-01-27T20:49:43.228+00:002012-01-27T20:49:43.228+00:00I'd love to attempt the task Bruce. Do I assum...I'd love to attempt the task Bruce. Do I assume correctly that you're looking for an assessment of 'mission accomplished' and 'suitability to purpose' rather than a proofreading?<br /><br />Rgds,<br /><br />ChucklesChuckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16075105127558792570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post-64762960760369461172012-01-27T19:16:07.622+00:002012-01-27T19:16:07.622+00:00Bruce,
Great news about the book.
I do not feel qu...Bruce,<br />Great news about the book.<br />I do not feel qualified myself to give you an opinion on it, nor do I probably have time at the moment to read it.<br />One of the reasons for the latter fact is that I am currently reading Rupert Sheldrake’s new book (The Science Delusion).<br />I have to assume you have read this and have probably discussed some of his points in your own book.<br />As regards your book, it would probably be useful if you could give us the present contents page or a list of headings dealt with.<br />Certainly, I will be buying the book when it comes out.SonofMosesnoreply@blogger.com