Saturday, 8 February 2025

Optimism and the ideology of progress: the Achilles Heel of Western Civilization

I have often commented on the absolute need and demand for optimism that is characteristic of our Western civilization. 

So much so; that many Western Christians have come to identify here-and-now, this-worldly, optimism with the virtue of Hope - which ought to come from faith and trust in God and the salvation of Jesus Christ that happens beyond death. 

So much so; that too many Western Christians refuse even to entertain pessimistic socio-political analyses, because for them pessimism about the future leads them to despair - which they rightly recognize as a sin. 

Their mistake is to suppose that the fault lies in the pessimism, rather than their own this-worldliness, their absolute demand to feel optimism. 

I will argue here that the ideology of progress, and the dependence on psychological optimism, are an Achilles Heel of Western civilization - which both explains and predicts the decline of real Christian faith: a faith that ought to be rooted in hope, not optimism. 


Historically, as the religion of Christianity waned, the ideology of Progress waxed; so that the one replaced the other as the dominant world view.

(The term religion ought to be reserved for religions with gods, spirits, another-world etc. Secular, materialist, this-worldly belief-systems - such as nationalism, communism and other species of Leftism - should instead be termed "ideologies".)  

This emergence of a "replacement for religion" of Progress was very evident, and much discussed, in the late 1800s and into the early decades of the 1900s - and it was so powerful a movement of thought that it hoovered-up and assimilated mainstream church Christianity. It also led to the Theosophical Society-derived, Hindu and Buddhist influenced, "New Age" spirituality of the past half century or so. 


Such a replacement of spiritual, other-worldly, religion by a this-worldly and materialist ideology; seems (in retrospect) almost inevitable - given the socio-political necessity for providing people in the Western nations with some sense of purpose and a basis for organization. 

This progressive expectation - this optimistic expectation - affected all the major Christian churches and denominations, especially those that saw (for some decades, at least) church growth - such as evangelicals both Protestant and Catholic, pentecostals, charismatics, Mormons... 

All were institutionally optimistic about continued expansion in numbers, growth in resources: outcomes of "success" that would be materially measurable. All looked towards some approaching this-worldly triumph, and socio-cultural dominance, or even takeover. 


Even that characteristic modern Western spiritual form called New Age, incorporated optimistic progressivism into its belief in reincarnation. 

Contrary to historical conceptualizations of reincarnation; New Age reincarnation provides grounds for optimism, being seen as an almost-inevitable process of learning, and consequent incremental increase in spiritual stature, with spiritual "progress" accumulating across many incarnations. 

New Age "Karma" will be the cause of this-incarnation constraints, and we may suffer set-backs from bad choices or bad-luck in our present life; but New Age Karma is essentially an optimistic process; building towards higher spiritual status.  


So - there are psychological (and consequently sociological) advantages to the modern spiritual ideology of optimistic progressivism. These include:

1. An expectation of change, therefore novelty and variety of life.

2. The expectation of something to look forward to, incremental betterment of the human condition; because things will improve - sooner or later, and all adversity is regarded as a set-back (e.g. the notion of "what does not kill me, will make me stronger").

3. Provision of a sense of historical direction, and therefore a basis organizing principle for one's life, and society. 

4. A belief that this Will Happen. That is, the implied (if not explicit) idea of "historical inevitability"; so that progress is something that happens to us, is imposed-upon us - and all we need do is respond accordingly; operating like a wave of positive change that we can surf into the future. 

   

However, there are (as is now evident) deep, inevitable, and ultimately fatal, problems with the ideology of progress, and a life built upon optimism. 

One is that by conflating Christian hope with optimism about this-world; Christians become vulnerable to despair when their life in this-world gets worse - and despair is something they are (rightly) told is a sin. 

Therefore, to avoid a despair which is actually a consequence of their secular and this-worldly ideology; such Christians refuse to be realistically pessimistic under any circumstances; e.g. deny the past reality and probable continuation of terminal decline in Christianity, and their church. 

They deny even the possibility that their church may be annihilated (whether by destruction, or by assimilation into some other institution or system) - because such a possibility would lead them into despair. 


The absolute necessity for optimism therefore renders modern Western populations (including most self-identified Christians) dangerously vulnerable to manipulation and external control, by any societal (or spiritual) powers that can affect their psychological state. 

At first people are manipulated into supporting almost any socio-political ideology that offers them an optimistic world view, that offers a feeling of participation in an inevitable trend...

But eventually, having been disappointed over and again, and having lost faith in a better this-world to come; then these people will be manipulated into despair - and by their own assumptions they will be trapped in this despair. 


In effect, such people will lose faith in God and will cease to believe in salvation, because they demand to feel optimistic about an inevitably better future in this-world. 

Such people will see their own pessimism as evidence of God's failure (or non-existence) to make this-world a progressively better place. 

And they will regard eternal salvation beyond death as merely a pitiable (and dubious) second-best compensation for what they regard as Jesus Christ's failure to ensure an always-improving mortal life and world. 


It can be seen that the ideology of optimism and the expectation of progress has been a highly successful long-term demonic strategy. 

Our only hope of hope, is our-selves to abandon the demand for optimism; which includes understanding and experiencing that the true object of Christian hope is located beyond the grave...

Such hope being situated safely out-of-reach of our current psychological feelings concerning the likely prospects for an improving mortal life on this earth. 


8 comments:

Wesley C. said...

Even in Christian hope though, there is a place for redeeming the whole world, including the physical universe we live in, because we know from Scripture that there will be a New Earth & Heaven and that creation groans for its redemption, meaning there is some optimism for the continued existence and enjoyment of God's physical creation even in proper Christian hope.

Hagel said...

These people you describe sound like they have small perspectives.
Even if profane progress continues, isn't the heat death of the world coming? Or is their god going to magically solve that, too?

Bruce Charlton said...

@Wesley - I personally don't think that is true. I take my understanding principally from the Fourth Gospel, which has nothing of the Second Coming or redemption of this mortal life and world. I believe that Jesus came to give us resurrected eternal life in Heaven - that is a second creation.

Bruce Charlton said...

@Hagel - From the materialist progressive POV; the heat death is a lot further off than our own death, which is regarded as the annihilation of self. So I don't think it has any relevance. The mainstream Western kind of optimism is about the future of this life, and this world - ultimately about how I feel, now.

Wesley C said...

@Bruce That is....an interesting position to take. Though not one I think is likely, since the book of Revelation literally has the New Jerusalem descending from Heaven down onto the Earth. The New Earth which in the final state of things exists alongside a New Heaven.

Bruce Charlton said...

@WC - I see you are new here. Well, to discuss meaningfully, one must start with assumptions, including how to read the Bible: https://lazaruswrites.blogspot.com/

No Longer Reading said...

#4 is a big one. And not just for Western Christians. For instance, the idea of the "right side of history" and we just need to acclimate ourselves to what must happen. Naturally, different groups disagree about what the inevitable events will be.

It sounds almost trivial, but it's true: unexpected things can happen. Back in hunter-gather times, people thought things would continue that way forever. And it did, for a long time, but not for always. Apparently Jonathan Edwards thought that many of the events of the Book of Revelation had already happened (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jonathan-Edwards, search "book of revelation"). People can have greater or lesser insight, but we should recognize a that model of what might happen is only what *might* happen.

Bruce Charlton said...

@NLR - I've come across quite a few people who argued that the Book of Revelation had already happened, but somehow nobody noticed!

It's a pretty bizarre argument, on the face of things - but then there have been utterly contradictory understandings of whether the world got better, or got worse, after the time of Jesus Christ. The medievals were sure there had been a *decline*, the further we got from revelation, going down to the end times.

But others have seen Jesus as having caused an improvement in the world, "progress" in other worlds - zig zagging but with an upward trend. For instance, many Protestants see the Reformation as an upturn, and Mormons would probably say the same about their Restoration.

My own view is that there is neither decline nor progress is correct *in these terms*, and that Jesus was not "about" making this-worldly matters *overall* better or worse.