Religions, as we know them, emerged in the era of Medieval consciousness - which was a millennia-long transition between the immersive passive un-consciousness of Original Participation and the current alienated Modern consciousness.
There were (perhaps) two main forms of religion - one for the masses, the other for elite religious specialists.
The Medieval mass consciousness was based on obedience to the religious institutions; and spiritual participation was made possible by intermediary phenomena; such as symbol, ritual, scripture, song - or social dynamics.
The Medieval elite consciousness was based upon control of the whole person by "will power"; that is by human will aligned with divine will.
The basic idea of Medieval era elite consciousness; was that a human being might discover the divine will; and then organized his life around the process of getting his own will into accord with the divine - and the totality of his behaviour into accord with his own divine-aligned will.
So, the religious life was about prolonged discipline and training (e.g. varieties of initiation); aiming towards conscious goals.
If successfully, the will was directed at the divine, and mastered all aspects of behaviour; to produce a transformed person (the higher type being described in various terms - holy, enlightened, an adept etc).
Since the religious elites led the masses - and the obedience of the masses was directed at the religious elites - it was vital that there was sufficient alignment between elite and divine will.
Usually - in most places, most of the time - there was not sufficient human-divine alignment.
But sometimes and in some places there was; so it remained a valid ideal; especially in a world where individual consciousness was not much developed in most people.
This idea of subordinating the whole of life to an elite will (purportedly aligned with the divine will) was "a good thing" insofar as the human will really was aligned with the divine will.
And also insofar as the Medieval mode of consciousness infused this process of deployment of human will with "the spirit"...
Because otherwise the whole thing was merely legalism - with all the ambiguities and imprecision intrinsic to the interpretation of language
It is this second aspect of the spirit infusing the human will, that has changed so much in the modern era - such that now the religious elites seldom even claim seriously to to be highly-aligned with divine will.
Indeed, elite religious authority is usually based upon the same modes as the secular - that is to say institutional legitimacy, laws, rules, guidance understood as normal language (and in practice interpreted in the secular ways that such language is interpreted - e.g. legalistically, by historical and linguistic analysis, quasi-scientifically etc).
What the modern era is left-with; is therefore the forms of Medieval consciousness, but minus the spontaneous spiritual infusion that used to accompany these forms.
This, I think, is a reason why the Medieval forms are so badly-disenchanted; and exhibit such a dry, monochrome, dull, "school dinners" atmosphere...
Lacking spiritual infusion, their motivate only feebly, sometimes imperceptibly feebly; and consequently the elite religious specialists become assimilated into mainstream elite social mores: which are currently those of bureaucratic totalitarianism; hence evil; hence anti-Christian.
(This can explain why the church leaders are the primary conduit for this-worldly and socio-politically-expedient corruption in the major Christian churches.)
And this, in turn, is why so many of the religious elite have turned away from them to immerse in the psychological gratifications - e.g. political spectacle-excitement, media entertainment, self-gratifying pseudo-moralism, therapies and palliatives - of mainstream secular culture.
"Successful" churches are nowadays enterprises; providing meeting places and organizing holidays, staging events, serving as cafes and theatres, hosting social and health services - and so forth.
This, then, is our situation. The aim, I presume; if our Christian life is to be strongly-enough motivated to transcend the pervasive pressure of secular society - is for each of us is to seek "enchantment" - i.e. infusion by divine spirit.
...That same spiritual infusion that Mankind enjoyed in the past - but accepting that this is not possible either by passive immersion or by mediating phenomena. In sum: We need to seek the spirit actively and consciously - or else it will not happen.
And we need to seek to integrate our-selves not by will power - which is now alienated from the divine. Nor by integration with the unconscious - from which we are detached, and which is anyway not Christian.
But instead by seeking re-connection with our own partially-divine, eternal, original selves that are currently cut-off and alienated -- both by modern culture; and cut-off also by the forms of Medieval religion without the spirit.
Because it is our eternal self that is in direct contact with the divine; and which therefore knows when it is aligned with God - and when it is (usually) more or less in a state of disharmony with creation - i.e. sin.
For us; will power, and the disciplined seeking of conscious goals that characterized elite religious life in the Medieval era of consciousness; needs to be secondary to seeking divine-motivation, and divine-guidance and correction, by this inner-directed seeking consciously to establish direct-contact with our eternal selves.
This is something new and unprecedented; and therefore difficult - but not so difficult as it may seem. The first step is to recognize what is wanted; then to recognize when it happens...
And the third step is not to expect too much!
What is needed is sufficient Christian motivation to be able to navigate a Christian life in a hostile world - the ability to discern and the commitment to choose the divine and reject the demonic.
We do not need, and shall not achieve, permanent and pervasive personal transformation for-the-better!
We will neither become holy nor enlightened persons (unless we already are these things).
But what is attainable; is a steady and robust desire to follow Jesus to resurrected eternal life in Heaven.
Very interesting. And this sentence spoke to me: "Because it is our eternal self that is in direct contact with the divine ... " If I'm understanding this, we can tap into that eternal self by sincerely accepting Jesus. I first experienced this at the age of 12 when a minister asked us to come forward to accept Jesus. I can only describe what I felt as a zap. I instantly felt at one with everything. Hard to describe but unforgettable and real--the most real thing I ever felt.
ReplyDelete@L - "we can tap into that eternal self by sincerely accepting Jesus. "
ReplyDeleteThat's not really what I meant, but it could happen that way, and apparently did for you. But even when it does, this does not produce a permanent positive transformation in a person.
It doesn't really make things easier either. What might make things easier (make discernment and learning easier) might be learning what it is to become aware of the real/ divine self; what spiritual guidance feels like... That sort of thing.
Our situation nowadays, compared with the past, is that there is no longer and generally effective "objective" *method" of doing what needs doing. This is why standard systems have lost effectiveness - sometimes altogether.
And why there must be individual initiative and learning.
Thanks very much for the reply. That "zap" I experienced was indeed very short-lived--five minutes at most. So right, no permanent positive transformation. But it was indescribably beautiful. Surreal even--in a good way.
DeleteI guess the way to keep it (or try--very difficult) would be reading the Bible, etc., while always keeping the Number One goal in mind--aligning with the divine.
In your paper, I think you're saying this was the primary goal of the Medieval elites--aligning with the divine. Unlike today--lots of theater and bureaucracy while capturing the divine sits on the back burner.
I don't want to take up your time. I'm just trying to understand. This is fascinating. Thank you!
It seems the "perennial philosophy" has lots of explanations as to what is currently wrong in society> Evola, Guenon, etc. much critique but no way to change things. Much talk about medieval spirituality but it is like a dense forest that really offers no way out of the maze. Your explanations of what a person might do is very helpful, it is really paying attention when you have the right intention and results will follow although in their own good time. When we are ready the spirit will move us and we will know it and it will be clear. Excellent article.
ReplyDelete@ag - Glad you liked it! It is written rather uncompromisingly, because I was "feeling my way" to some extent, as I wrote.
ReplyDelete@L - If you are interested, I can only suggest you read through some of the links - because what I am saying is a whole other world!
ReplyDelete