Thursday, 25 June 2026

The providential benefits of Not getting what we want

My conclusion is that benefits of Not getting what we want, only happen if we are capable of learning from our life experience. 

The trouble is that some people are not capable of learning. 

These are the type who spend their years eaten up with "if only" regrets, concerning their failure to achieve this or that which - it seems evident - either made no perceptible difference, or could never possibly have yielded the satisfactions they imagine it would - and often enough would have done them harm.  


The main area for such delusory failings to get is probably sexual relationships. Much of my early life was a sequence of "If Only" with respect to this or that girl; combined with recurrent (and rapid) disillusion about my actual "success" in sometimes getting who I wanted. 

Looking back I am only grateful that I did Not always (or usually) get what I then wanted. My early life often seems like a sequence of "bullets" fortunately avoided, or bullets that hurt but left only light wounds - it would be awarding me way too much kudos to say these bullets were "dodged". 

Mostly this stuff happened-to me, rather than me taking responsibility in any serious fashion. 

I very seldom deserve any credit for avoiding harm (either prospectively or retrospectively) - but only for (perhaps belatedly) recognizing and acknowledging that harm had indeed been avoided. 


And also professionally, career-wise; there were things I worked hard to get or to keep - but failed; and it very often now seems providential that here too I did Not get what I (most?) wanted. 

In sum, and with a few supremely important exceptions; it seems that it would have been a distinctly Bad Thing for me to have gotten those things I most wanted at most phases of my life. 

It was lucky that I did not usually succeed, in those terms I set for myself. 


One  general lesson is that there are vital lessons to be learned from failure; and we often ought to be glad for many, indeed most, of the (inevitable) set-backs to our plans and desires. 

(This is why people who do not acknowledge their failures, or those who regard themselves as victims are in such deep spiritual trouble. Only by acknowledging failure can we learn - and we are alive, mainly, to learn.) 

But on the other side; there are some moments when everything, so-many good possibilities, apparently hinge upon attaining a particular success - in a fashion that is existentially intoxicating and undermining. 

We must then do our bit, make the right choices and stick by them - although most of what happens to generate that situation, seems very much "out of our hands"; as if requiring astonishing chains of coincidence. 


My conclusion includes that providence is of extreme importance in our lives; especially considering that most people think that the notion of providence is impossible: merely pathetic, idiotic, nonsense. 

But while providence often helps us when have done little or nothing to deserve help, it cannot and should not be relied-upon to lead our life for us. 

(Indeed, although providence is indispensable; our lives would be literally worth-less if providence was the whole story.)

There always comes a point when we need to make choices in the context of a situation that providence has served-up to us. 

And that is when "what we want" becomes of supreme importance. 


12 comments:

  1. Well said-- and yet KNOWING this seems to make no different to regret, at least in my case!

    ReplyDelete
  2. @mal - Well, maybe not acutely, but I have found reflecting in the bigger picture to be valuable in putting stuff behind me.

    For instance, when I got sacked from editing Medical Hypotheses, I lost quite a lot of money, and a position of some power and influence.

    But quite quickly I realized that the job had already become tainted and was beginning to be corrupted by the changes in science - and it was inconceivable I could have continued to do the job without being drawn in.

    So now it seems right that things ended (approximately) when they did - and I only regret that I wasted as much effort as I did in "fighting" what was both inevitable and right.

    The same for the jobs I applied for and was rejected or lost from some administrative cock-up - nearly all of these were on what would certainly have been along the wrong line of endeavour, or located in the wrong place - and it was doing me a favour (an undeserved favour) to knock me back!

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's quite an impressive catalogue of acts of Providence! Though I know your point is that we have all experienced this. Certainly there are some moments in my own life that I can see as Providential.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Mal - Given that the natural (materialist) tendency of the world is in general towards things going Wrong (i.e. entropy) then I guess that almost everything which (against the odds) goes Right instead, is actually a consequence of providence.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Around where I live, one benefit of the hard market for housing is people are much more likely to acknowledge Providence’s hand when they actually manage to buy a house. Not that I don’t see people fall into arrogance also, but it’s just so extreme where for instance I have twice the house and many times the land of my peers only because we bought 3 or so years earlier, which only happened because it just happened to happen, not because we made some clever plan. My neighborhood also unbelievably was able to put up a gate on a public road to protect against a massive new development next door, and I’ve been so pleased to see a general acknowledgement even among non-Christian neighbors that humble gratitude toward Providence is the proper response (even though a great deal of human effort went into this as well).

    One of the reasons I converted is because I deal with probability and statistics for my profession and the coincidences piled up beyond what I could write off to chance. I don’t mean big, complicated things like the miracle of a professed libertine ending up by chance monogamously mated for life, but rather small things like the many, many times I’ve *just* avoided serious injury or death while driving compared to the 0 times I’ve been injured even slightly in a car. More broadly I find it bizarre that cars hardly ever touch each other while both driving when for instance as a cyclist I have been slightly hit many times.by cars and other bikes (and pedestrians and skateboards etc.) or when parked cars get hit regularly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Mia - wrt cars; I know what you mean.

    The old law of driving so slowly that a chap with a red flag can walk in front is not all that stupid in terms of theoretical prediction of the likely dangers of having millions of ordinary (including sub-ordinary) people weaving around a few few apart at 100-plus mph closing speed, or skimming near to pedestrians.

    That multiple-thousands of people haven't been slaughtered every day for a century; is not so much a miracle, nor reason for complacency, as evidence of *something else* at work in human affairs.

    Mutatis mutandis for a myriad of other functionalities in the world, in the universe.

    The only reason this stuff is not regarded as "evidence" for deity, is that our metaphysics already *assumes* that God is a priori impossible, "because" the notion is meaningless, dumb, nonsense. (Plus top down evil motivated PSYOPS, of course.)

    I remember thinking exactly that way myself, and for decades. It was only after really grasping that All my reasoning (evidence, logic, inferences etc) were built on the prior assumption of Not-God that I was able, gradually, to realize what was going-on.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I worked at a mine site for a few years in the logistics section. I was driving a tele-handler one day - a kind of big diesel-powered all-terrain forklift - helping a guy load a pallet of parts onto his work truck. Unfortunately the pallet was wedged onto the forks and I couldn't pull out without dragging the pallet off the truck altogether. This fellow, a young welder, jumps forward between the forks and pushes up against the pallet to hold it onto the truck so that I can pull the forks out.

    I go to hit the accelerator with my foot and something stops me. Something is wrong, terribly wrong, but I don't know what. Then I realize - I'm not hearing the tele-handler's back-up alarm. If I'm in reverse, there should be a loud beeping all around me, but all I could hear was the idling engine.

    I look down and see that the transmission is still in first gear forward.

    Being as this machine had an auto brake, every time you hit the gas you had to gun the engine rpms to disengage it. Had I ignored that inner warning, I would've gunned the ~15,000 lbs machine straight forward into the man's spine.

    I've had other moments of Providence also - me and some other students from my flight school almost collided our planes over Niagara Falls after flying separately across the continent. My co-pilot and I gave a position report over the public band, and the fellows in the other trainer looked down at the ground and their circuit map and realized they were in the exact same position. All I saw was the blue underside of their fuselage about 200 yards away, flying in the same direction and altitude as us, but almost rolling inverted to avoid us. My co-pilot shoved the stick so hard forward we became weightless in our harnesses. Fun times!

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Epi - The thing is, such spectacular instances of being saved from disaster are infrequent enough that they can be ignored as coincidental. But once we start recognizing that the potential threats to (for instance) our own health and survival are un-countably vast, then we are beyond the possibility of coincidence.

    The number of things in the human body that have the potential to go wrong, including lethally wrong - at every level from the molecular upward - is staggering. Add the threats from other people, and in the biological and mineral environment.

    If it was not for some powerful, purposive, *positive* influence operating against all this -- or rather, without some positive and creative impulse and process *in the first place* - normal everyday health and reproduction are almost "infinitely" unlikely!

    (To simplify) Without *first* divine creation, there could be no degeneration, disease or death. Without creation there would be nothing and nobody to get old, ill, or die.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I took a course on cellular communication from the highly anti-Christian Biology department head at my University. I really enjoyed the course, but looking back it was odd. The premise of the course was learning about cellular biology through the way infectious diseases operate. So the whole idea was looking at various types of failures in order to understand the correct functioning. Yet the professor was wild about the “impossibility” of certain things, like mad cow infecting humans, because the connections for cellular communication are so precise. So by studying failures we conclude that nothing can fail, I guess! Many years later when I learned more about the extent that biologists and doctors make claims about what is and isn’t possible in the human body based on inferences, models, and computer simulations rather than direct observation and so this no longer surprises me (“Aluminum can’t cross the blood-brain barrier because the computer said so,” etc, is just par for the course at this point.)

    Main point being: everything on down to the forces holding matter together are wildly improbable. Only a generalized force of willful, purposive benevolence and ordering accounts for this.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Mia - My general impression is that "Biology" is extinct in universities. I was lucky to catch the tail end of the subject with my Oxford University syllabus A-Level Biology, that built from a complete overview of all plants and animals and their inter-relations. This was of great value to me some twenty years later when I went in for being a theoretical scientist.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I’m sure you’re right. I almost added before that I later learned that department head was generally despised by the researchers. Apparently he had the position because he was a good fundraiser.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I take your point, Dr. Charlton, but that certainly wasn't my reaction at the time.

    These sorts of little spectacular stories are littered across the New Testament, and they don't seem to get much attention in and of themselves. Jesus somehow walking through a crowd that had carried up a mountain to throw him off, Paul marching through shipwrecks and city-wide manhunts around the Mediterranean like some kind of Terminator, etc. etc. Things just somehow going right, as if chance and coincidence are just so many loaded dice...

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated. "Anonymous" comments are deleted without being read.