tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post2388699545245166435..comments2024-03-28T21:32:26.550+00:00Comments on Bruce Charlton's Notions: A satisfying and coherent theory of Christ's atonementBruce Charltonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09615189090601688535noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post-49277763601937431452013-05-12T19:53:44.358+01:002013-05-12T19:53:44.358+01:00@WmJas - Thanks for the Ostler recommend - I read ...@WmJas - Thanks for the Ostler recommend - I read and enjoyed it, and found it to be a much more scholarly and precise expression of my own beliefs about the BoM.Bruce Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09615189090601688535noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post-15674101101420054322013-05-12T17:09:26.114+01:002013-05-12T17:09:26.114+01:00If you haven't already read it, I recommend Os...If you haven't already read it, I recommend Ostler's "The Book of Mormon as a Modern Expansion of an Ancient Source" (<a href="http://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=ostler%20book%20of%20mormon%20as&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&ved=0CEwQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dialoguejournal.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsbi%2Farticles%2FDialogue_V20N01_68.pdf&ei=Z76PUdK2JomgkgXu0oDQBw&usg=AFQjCNEDEZ8m1up-dWnd_fe8g_n3Ik0gjw&sig2=slfuoOlQm1kiasfhT68iuw&bvm=bv.46340616,d.dGI" rel="nofollow">pdf</a>). I think his approach to scripture would be congenial to your way of thinking.Wm Jashttp://wmjas.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post-79755414875128113562013-05-08T18:36:44.602+01:002013-05-08T18:36:44.602+01:00@ajb - More synchronicity! Bring it on!@ajb - More synchronicity! Bring it on!Bruce Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09615189090601688535noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post-16767292330642193462013-05-08T17:42:37.210+01:002013-05-08T17:42:37.210+01:00After recently thinking up the notion that waters ...After recently thinking up the notion that waters were postulated to be above us because the sky is blue, and then yesterday looking up at a blue sky stretching across the horizons and more fully appreciating that sentiment, I then the same day watch a video where there is a diagram and the theory presented that waters were postulated to be above us because the sky is blue.<br /><br />"Ostler is an 'amateur' who makes his living as an attorney and not by teaching philosophy - that is probably an essential in order to do real philosophy (i.e. for the right reasons) these days"<br /><br />Interesting ..ajbhttp://makingsenseofchristianity.comnoreply@blogger.com