tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post3959623992256701017..comments2024-03-28T17:44:11.289+00:00Comments on Bruce Charlton's Notions: Spiritual Science as a Goethian ScienceBruce Charltonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09615189090601688535noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4683970826895755480.post-12406582115960609772016-05-11T13:15:53.382+01:002016-05-11T13:15:53.382+01:00Wow. Now we are getting somewhere with these posts...Wow. Now we are getting somewhere with these posts. All things are flux as Heraclitus is quoted to say but this does not negate the essence of a thing that tranacends a flowing process. Whilst we may not be able to step into the same river twice, there is still a river. The two extremes of non-dualist and dualism are both sides to the same coin. To claim one side of the coin is mutually exclusive to the existence of the other side is to err. This is why there can be an immortal soul and a false self. There can be a static nirvana and an emergent personal Godhead from the divine ground. We can have a science that does not claim the material negates the spiritual ot the immaterial. Both are essential for wholeness and are equally real and valid. Our modern task is to bridge the divide between these two drifting icebergs of thought. They drifted apart beyond site at the enlightenment but they are still inextricably connected by the depths of pristine ocean.David Balfourhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12099160562774064281noreply@blogger.com