Secular modernity justifies itself in terms of power.
Secular materialism is proved by power.
(Modernity considered as a cause was validated by the effect of power.)
Animism - the universe alive, purposive, relevant and in-relation - was never refuted, merely discarded because we don't 'need' it - materially we were better without it (for a while).
In sum, discarding animism yielded power. Discarding animism means that the universe is defined by human use, human gratification.
Modernity gave us what we wanted; nobody and nothing could stop us (for a while).
Yet, power - which seems to justify modernity - now refutes modernity: modernity is dwindling in size, in power.
Look at the world: what is growing in power? Not modernity.
Who is growing in power? Not materialists.
Therefore by its own criteria of validity secular modernity is false: if modernity was proved by expanding power (for a while) then modernity is now refuted by the collapse of this power.
The decline of modernity, the rise of supernaturalism; these do not validate animism of course; but they prove that if the reasons for discarding animism were indeed related to enhancement of human power, then these reasons were mistaken.
Western man created a dead, meaningless universe - a void, to dwell in. He dissolved all into nihilism.
It seemed necessary, in order to gain the power to get the comfort and distractions he craved above all.
It turns out we do not value comfort and distraction enough to raise a finger to keep them.
It turns out we do not want power - but want to give it away to almost anybody.
It turns out Western man took the living universe and drained it of all significance for nothing.
So - Why does Western man cling to nothing with such tenacity?