I explain why it is an objective fact that the Norman invaders of England, from 1066 and for generations afterwards, were not true Kings, but merely arrogant, successful and self-glorified gangsters, thugs and thieves. They were effective in their brutality; but grossly inefficient in their destructiveness (of people and land) and endemic disloyal infighting over the rulershipship of a nation they looted like pirates. William the Conquerer was well named - because that was how he and his kin behaved.
http://albionawakening.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/the-norman-kings-bad-because.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated. "Anonymous" comments are deleted without being read.