There are no objective facts in mainstream public discourse; public facts are consensus, and consensus is the power to manufacture and impose facts.
This is a consequence of modern consciousness. Modern Men are aware that facts are not Out There, because there is always a consciousness, always subjectivity.
Science is dead, because there is no public discourse of "objective" facts. There is no public consensus that regards truth as primary; because truth refers to divine creation and its purposes, nature and duties; and creation is denied.
Someone who denies consensus facts, will not, therefore, nowadays, be factually refuted; but will be dealt-with by denigrating his motivation.
It is counter productive to argue facts with someone who regards you (labels you) as of evil intent, dishonest, insane or dumb. (And consensus power can and does label even -especially! - geniuses as dumb.)
Everything in public discourse therefore reduces to motivation, and meaningful exchange is only possible among those with shared motivation.
Consequently, public discourse is just phatic speech, small talk... Supportive noises among interest groups.
Everything hinges upon motivation.
The worrying thing is that the evil/secular/ leftist Establishment seem to recognize this, and ignores facts whenever this is expedient, and focuses on a discourse of "which side" a person is on...
While it is the Christian side who persist in trying to argue with facts; and who cripple their own discernment with (nonsensical, not Christian) scruples about 'judgmentalism' and "giving the benefit of the doubt" ... to their evil (lying and manipulative) enemies.
Thus the side of evil know who they are, and know their enemies; while Christians are fatally confused about both!
The side of evil are also correct in recognizing that what matters is affiliation, which side? They don't care whether someone is nice or nasty, they only notice whether he is loyal to evil, or not.
Whereas, by contrast, Christians make the (unChristian) error of assuming that only nice people can be on their side, that nasty people must be evil-affiliated...
Yet nowadays, there are extremely few nice Christians - ie. extremely few nice people on the side of Good.
(Nearly all the nice Christians I knew changed sides in 2020, and now serve the totalitarian agenda of evil.)
In other words, Christians cannot win the spiritual war against evil with the assumptions and tactics they have chosen, and they will lose by serving the Satanic agenda, hence ceasing to be Christian.
...Such are enemies of God; regardless of their niceness, orthodoxy, or devout Church membership and practices.
In any scripture, very often authors mis-represent or mis-interpret whatever a Teacher said (like Jesus Christ in the New Testament; how much is "true" in there and how much is "false"?)
ReplyDeleteYou wrote: "Thus the side of evil know who they are, and know their enemies; while Christians are fatally confused about both!"
Situations like that are often caused by Biblical quotes, which many Christians consider "the Truth". An example, in Matthew 5:38-42 it says:
"You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." 39But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. 40And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. 41And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. 42Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you.
— Jesus Christ, English Standard Version
Many of us are aware now that if you "send" good, positive energy to "evil", it is still energy and "evil" will thank you for it and turn it into something that is negative and suits its (evil's) purpose. You can't love the Devil to death. Too many New-Agers (and others) get indeed confused as you wrote. It suffices to look for the origin of the confusion to realize who is the originator of that message.
In real exorcisms (and those do exist), not love is aimed at the devil, but rather rightful force to defend the spirit of the one attacked.
@wk. I agree with your main point. It seems most modern self-identified Christians devote most of their life, time and resources to promoting the agenda of evil; without discerning that that is what they are doing, and indifferent to the truth, and indeed actively resisting the truth.
ReplyDelete