Tuesday, 25 February 2025

The current orgy of virtual Schadenfreude


The current online orgy of virtual Schadenfreude - triggered by media reports of the activities of the new US Presidential administration - is a dismaying spectacle in many ways, from my Christian perspective.

"Schadenfreude" describes the (spiteful) emotion of gratification at the (real or imagined) sufferings of others - typically of one's enemies. "Real or imagined" is relevant, since the current sufferings are substantially imagined, being learned-of via news-media reports and governmental/ bureaucratic announcements. 

That is why I inserted the word "virtual" - because the information on the sufferings is substantially indirect, secondhand, and obtained via mass/social media and from State sources. 


At least two things should be said about this online delight. 

The first is to clarify that reports of sufferings will almost certainly be misleading. 

The second, and more important, that the reported activities being celebrated are almost-wholly negative and destructive in nature - therefore not driven by any explicit and conscious, positive Christian motivation.


I have been deeply suspicious of claims of destruction of the managerial bureaucracy, since I had inside experience of such events about thirty years ago, within the UK National Health Service. 

The government of that era claimed to be determined to "cut red tape", including severely reducing the particular layer of bureaucracy within-which I was working. 

Official announcements from the specific layer of NHS bureaucracy also claimed (and complained) that it was being reduced severely. About 150 jobs were supposedly to be cut from a single office complex where I worked - and official returns to this effects were submitted. 

The news media duly reported the 150 jobs cut. 


Yet those on the inside knew that this was a kind of theatre for public consumption. 

In reality, hardly any jobs were cut - and these were almost exclusively among those who wanted to leave anyway and were grateful for severance pay. 

Nearly all of the 150 sacked/ let-go were redeployed within the larger organization; and/or rehired into almost the same jobs, shortly after the big announcement of cuts. 

The message is that, when you hear or read about job-cuts, layoffs, closures etc; all this kind of stuff may quite easily be faked - but faked in a way that is not detectable without detailed inside knowledge. 


The deeper problem with this current celebrations of destruction, is that of the underlying motivation. (Because the difference between virtue and sin, between good and evil, is essentially that of motivation - rather than specific action). 

A motivation for destruction as such, is anti-divine-creation, hence an evil motivation - and therefore leads to more and greater evil. 

And this applies pretty much for anything that might be destroyed - almost regardless of how useless or evil it is. 


An historical comparison could be the Dissolution of the Monasteries that happened in England under the rule of Henry the Eighth. 

The Roman Catholic Church itself, and its religious orders in particular - monasteries, friaries, priories, nunneries - owned a vast and still increasing proportion of the national wealth (from memory, something between a third and a half of the land). 

Church abuses were rife and widely experienced by the English population; there was a good deal of exploitation, luxury, self-indulgence, and political activity; and apparently much less (although certainly still a significant amount!) of asceticism, scholarship, piety, charity, and virtue. 

Therefore, there was no shortage of those among the English who celebrated (even when they did not personally benefit from) the truly colossal appropriation, violence and destruction that followed. 

My impression is that there was a good deal of tacit, if not active, public support for the Dissolution - as well as senior political, and a large segment of religious, leadership involvement. 


A great deal, therefore, of Schadenfreude was evident in the Dissolution. 

For instance; when the last major Abbey, in Glastonbury, was closed and demolished, and the greatest monastic library in England was destroyed; and its Abbot and two other senior clerics were publicly hung on top of Glastonbury Tor - it seems that the local population were pleased to observe their ex-landlords get "what was coming to them". 

Yet the Dissolution of the Monasteries was a national catastrophe, especially for the middle and poorer classes, from which it took England generations to recover - if indeed it ever did recover. More than a century of terribly destructive religious wars and exterminations were initiated. For many decades, there were almost no schools or hospitals, and no organized provision for relief of the poor.  


My simple point is that when goals are negative and destruction is the primary aim - and when this is unacknowledged, un-repented; spiritual disaster will surely ensue. Because this is, in effect, a celebration and endorsement of evil. 

No amount of negative action ever amounts to a positive strategy - and almost all current self-styled positive motivations are merely double-negative simulations. Or else, like Western "nationalism" as of 2025; almost wholly wishful, conjectural - hence in practice very secondary to other motives, and far too feeble to be effectual. 

With respect to the native populations of Western nations in 2025; any motivation that is truly good, positive, virtuous; absolutely needs to be consciously chosen and a grass-roots/ bottom-up phenomenon. 

Because, however differently things were in the past, good cannot now be done covertly nor in a top-down fashion. 

So that all fantasies of covert positive top-down agendas among the ruling elites are impossible, as well as unreal.   

  

In sum - the current orgy of online Schadenfreude may concern much that is merely virtual; and by its celebration of negative and destructive motivations, is very likely (from a Christian point of view) to prove multi-valently corrupting of those who engage in it. 

(As, indeed, seems to be the case.) 


6 comments:

Francis Berger said...

Surely, the expressed disappointment over Pope Francis's potential recovery from his current illness is not a part of this orgy.

After all, disappointed Catholics sincerely yearn for a better pope so they can have a better church, and that can't happen while Francis is still breathing. Still, they are at least earnestly praying for the man's soul, and that God will grant the pontiff grace (hopefully, on the other side).

Or something.

Bruce Charlton said...

@frank - One of the most dangerous of recurrent delusions is "at least things can't get any worse than they have been".

And then the Tsar is succeeded by Lenin.

And Lenin is succeeded by Stalin...

Wm Jas Tychonievich said...

I don’t think being happy that people are being removed from power is necessarily the same as taking pleasure in their suffering, but agree that either way it’s a “negative” focus. Also agree that this sort of stuff is extremely easy to fake.

Bruce Charlton said...

@Wm - Being happy that people are being removed from power is not a bad thing. Indeed, at a greater extreme, being happy that some particular person is dead is not a bad thing.

But being happy at other people suffering because they are removed from power IS a bad thing - not least because this is something to which we are (nearly) all of us prone.

No Longer Reading said...

One could envision a potential strategy of clearing away the dross first before implementing a positive agenda. It's not sufficient, but if well-motivated it's at least a starting point.

But, what gets me is that the doesn't seem to be even an attempt to address the problems of the 21st century. Wokeness is bad, but techno-totalitarianism is more pervasive and influential. And it is one of the main factors that even made wokeness possible. If society is a division of autonomous real communities, then these problems will only arise in some, if at all. But if you destroy that, because it's "inevitable" or it will lead techno-utopia or whatever, well, then you get the situation we're in now.

And so many of the people cheering on techno-totalitarianism were alive decades before it became widespread. Their happiest memories were in the time before techno-totalitarianism and they will often regale people with stories from that era, but they feel like they should inflict it on other people. Because it's "inevitable" or "necessary" or something.

It's very disappointing.

Bruce Charlton said...

@NLR "One could envision a potential strategy of clearing away the dross first before implementing a positive agenda. It's not sufficient, but if well-motivated it's at least a starting point."

Yes, but that is a theoretical possibility - there isn't the slightest indication that it is what is afoot. The only positivity is the vague ad-slogan of Making America Great - which can mean anything or nothing - but the added "Again" implies going back to the pre-woke era (i.e. Cold War, Vietnam etc). Nothing new. just the old techno-totalitarianism, as you say.

It is indeed disappointing to see so many people who spent so many years being skeptical about media distortion and manipulation, suddenly believing everything that pleases their lust for destruction of enemies.

It has reached mania pitch with the crazed response to the staged and acted spat wrt to the Fire Nation war, a couple of days ago; which I have seen described as an inflexion point in modern history - rather than the would-be manipulative (and deeply dishonest) PR stunt it so evidently was.