I need not bother to provide evidence of how little the Establishment cares about the safety of children in the UK.
All their favourite strategic policies torment, harm and kill children; and then condone and conceal this - directly, or indirectly.
So when there is legislation that purports to be motivated by concern for the "safety of children", we should immediately know that this is a lie - and the motivation is certainly quite other.
And know too that the real motivation is certain to be evil - or else it would not systematically, and by saturation and coordination, have been lied-about.
It seems that the access to media is already more explicitly and aggressively restricted in the UK than any other Western nation - especially after geopolitical events in early 2020, and then again from early 2022.
A lot of stuff that can be read online from the US, Commonwealth and Europe; has been blocked in the UK for the past three-to-five years.
You didn't realise?
Well that is significant - one way or the other.
Q: What kind of stuff is blocked?
A; Stuff critical of the major programs of UK Establishment policy, of course!
Those Litmus Test issues I linked early.
So far this past week I have noticed several blog posts blocked by a message stating that the problem with content is child safety - when actually the content is related to some kind of analysis of (privileged and powerful) social and ethnic groups.
Would-be readers are sometimes asked to provide "age verification" (i.e. to create an account and explicitly identify themselves), in order to read this anti-Establishment material.
Well, I expected nothing else - the West is now, after all, a fully-totalitarian society, just closing a few remaining loopholes of un-restricted discourse.
And They are only interested in doing things to Us; and not-at-all in what We want; and it has been like this for many years.
As always, the truly vital thing is is that we:
1.Recognize the situation.
2. Recognize it for what it is - i.e. They are lying in order to harm us - physically, but mainly spiritually.
3. Recognize the net-evil strategic motivations of our leadership class - whether institutional, national, and global leadership.
4. Realize that therefore the worst spiritual harm comes from Our consenting to the validity of Their imposed world-view and motivations; and from consenting to Their authority to control Our world-view and motivations.
5. Be confident that They cannot spiritually harm Us... unless we invite Them into our hearts.
But that is exactly what So Many people do in excusing Them as having naïve good intentions, or being merely selfish and greedy, or being merely stupid and ignorant and short-sighted.
Things are much worse than that.
In truth; Our leaders do bad things to Us, for bad reasons.
What we need to do is be clear and explicit in our own minds as to what is going on and why; and then to reject it as evil*!
Too many people jump to advocating effective organized opposition... Not that this ever actually-happens! - but that does not stop people calling for it, automatically; like a speak-your-weight machine.
But opposition as such is futile and indeed counter-productive, especially when opposition is itself motivated by some strategically net-evil programme, inevitably rooted in the hedonic materialism of all public discourse.
Corrective and good social action may or may not be possible in practice; but whether possible or not, good action cannot possibly happen without a prior and sustained inner act of discernment, responsibility and courage.
While of course we should strive not to cooperate or support evil; organized opposition will be futile or counter-productive unless genuinely motivated at every level; because to evil does not lead to good, unless there is motivation to good.
And at the bottom line, as this process expands and envelops, we should recall that, in net-effect; mass/social media do vastly more harm than good.
All restrictions on mass media will almost-inevitably make it less popular overall, less engaging, less addictive.
So that, by pursuing short-term expediency, evil is (to a significant extent) thwarting its own long term success.
After all; to be denied some particular external inputs, and to be thrown-back upon our own personal experiences, evaluations, personal contacts, and individual reasoning - is probably just what we most need.
In our civilization and nation; things probably need to get worse before they can get better - but they will get better only if we first understand enough of what is going-on.
*(That is what is required of Christians for salvation - it is indeed, all that is required of us, in a negative sense. Of course, the reality is that to move on to resurrected eternal Heavenly life, we must commit eternally to live only by love - and the rejecting of evil is really just a means to that end.)
No comments:
Post a Comment