This is perhaps why questions asked of witnesses in court, and their answers, need to be short and simple.
(But this is misleading if the assumptions behind the questions, the assumptions within-which the questions arise; are wrong.)
That's perhaps functionally OK... if it works.
But Word Spells may work only temporarily, or in certain contexts. For instance; the complex and abstract Word Spells of Trinitarianism were not designed to answer questions; but to stop Christians persecuting and killing each other in the early Christology disputes, by employing a kind of hypnosis.
This, more or less, worked... for a while - until the soothing enchantment was broken by the rise of Islam
(Which was, I think, substantially rooted in a clear, simple, rational rejection of the literal non-sense of Trinitarian Word Spelling.)
Other initially successful examples of word-spelling include the crucial areas of the necessity for Jesus Christ, the nature of free-will, and the origins of evil - in a world that is defined as the product of an omnipotent and omniscient God who created everything from nothing. The traditional answers to these questions work insofar as they complexify and abstract; until the problem is lost-sight-of and/or the irrelevance or insufficiency of the answer is lost-sight-of.
But in Christian theology, the traditional Word Spells clearly do not work anymore, and has not worked for several generations.
Word-spelling comes with the price that everybody is then asleep or dazed, insofar as they are Christian.
Since they are deeply and ineradicably confused and disorientated by the abstractness and complexity their theology; Christians are not strongly motivated. they are in a state of permanent uncertainty as to what they are supposed to have as their primary priorities and fundamental convictions and desires.
Therefore Christians have, by default, become passively-assimilated to worldly evil and; and now Christian churches support the Satanic totalitarian agenda - as became explicitly evident in 2020 and since.
Any viable answer must include a refusal and rejection of theological Word Spells; and the inexorable demand for simplicity and clarity concerning what it is to be a Christian, what is entailed by becoming a follower of Jesus.
A suitable answer must, like any truthful answer, depend on valid assumptions concerning the nature of reality.
But it must also be the kind of short, simple, and concrete answer that would be acceptable in a law court.
**
Note: This post was developed from a comment I made at Francis Berger's blog.