Wednesday, 24 September 2025

The change of human consciousness throughout my life-span

We all begin our lives in the state of immersive, spontaneous, initially un-conscious Original Participation - which was, pretty much, the consciousness of mature adults in the earliest (e.g. hunter gatherer) phase of human history - a state of mind when we are in direct contact with an animistic (living, purposive, aware) universe of beings/ spirits, gods. 


The Medieval Consciousness (aka Intellectual Soul) is that of the great span of recorded human history, of agricultural society, of civilization - the "axial age" when religions were developed; changing through the Ancient Egyptian (for example), Ancient Greek, Roman and into the Medieval era. 

During this era, spirituality was largely communal, and contact with the world of spirit (experience of the spirit within us) was via intermediaries such as church structures, priests, symbolism and ritual. 

For Christians this type of consciousness reached a peak in the Byzantine and Holy Russian societies of Orthodox Catholicism; and for Westerners it peaked in the Medieval times with Roman Catholicism in Western Europe. 

Modern Consciousness - in which man is alienated from God, the gods, the world of spirits, and other beings; began to emerge with the Renaissance and Reformation (as traditional forms and symbols began to lose their objectivity and power) - and accelerated through the Industrial Revolution up to now. 

So that now it seems obvious common sense that this is a purposeless, meaningless, dead universe - going nowhere, and in which we humans and individual persons are irrelevant; such that our "morality" is merely maximizing pleasure and minimizing suffering until we die and are annihilated. 


Looking back; it now seems that I experienced the dying residuum of the Medieval Consciousness; which, although relatively feeble and only among a minority, was behind the radicalism of the counter-cultural desire for a simple, "natural", agrarian - and essentially modified-Medieval - life and society. 

My point is that until the late 1970s a restoration of Medieval Cosnciousness actually seemed a realistic possibility; such that alternative living and self-sufficiency were topics of mainstream social discussion and aspiration. The revival of folk music and arts, and even "hippie" styles of dress and fashion - all seemed to presage this. 

It really seemed possible then that we might "go back" to a village-based and agricultural society - on lines described earlier by William Cobbett, and depicted fictionally by William Morris. 

Much of the mass youth interest in Tolkien was related to the hope aroused by his work that a Middle Earth kind of life might yet be genuinely possible. 

And for some (but not me, at that time), this included an expectation that Christianity would again have a central and pervasive influence on society: a Chesterton/ Belloc type Distributism.  


But through my life span the Medieval Consciousness has faded in objectivity and power; until now it is not regarded as a realistic possibility - or only except in a remote, abstract, wishful and as-if kind of fashion. 

This can be seen in the disintegration, decline and corruption of all the major Christian churches; and their extreme alienation and giving up of shaping spiritual experience.

But the most significant decline of Medieval Consciousness (and the cause of church changes) is in the minds of Men - an inexorable dwindling which I have both experienced and observed. 


This is where we find ourselves. I regard these changes in consciousness as objective, as causal, and as irreversible. 

So it is from here that we ought to regard the future.

Since we cannot go back, and (further) my experience and observations suggest that trying to revert ourselves and society to Medievalism of consciousness is not just ineffective; but actually spiritually harmful... That, any rate, is how I read the various "utopian" experiments in back-to-the-land, communal and Alternative living. 


Since what we have now is so dominated by the powers of evil, and so devoid of both purpose and meaning and hope - it seems to me that it is imperative we actively and consciously attempt to move our consciousness, and consequently our lives, forward into nigh unprecedented territory

**


NOTE: It may sound, from the above, as if I regarded Original Participation and Medieval Consciousness as taboo, necessarily harmful and to-be-shunned; but this is not the case. For many people, in many situations, both still have much to offer in the way of "therapy", encouragement, and even guidance. However the point I wish to emphasize is that they are not enough. They are both too feeble for what is necessary in our world, and both are harmful if made a strategy. They cannot suffice. There is no future in them. 

17 comments:

  1. >except in a remote, abstract, wishful and as-if kind of fashion

    I experienced that when visiting Pangbourne near Reading recently. There was a butcher's shop, a baker's, pharmacy, cheese shop, hardware. Very unusual for a village in England.

    There's a nostalgia for that sort of thing but it is really is just a dream. Another example is the way the word 'community' is applied willy-nilly to all sorts of groups. People who barely know one another, let alone are *dependent* on each other as they were in medieval villages.

    >alternative living and self-sufficiency were topics of mainstream social discussion and aspiration

    Yes I re-watched The Good Life on DVD about a decade ago and it was clear from titillating party games in the final episode that in that show they weren't aspiring to anything higher than the sexual revolution.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Do you suppose that men who lived before the advent of modern consciousness have the opportunity postmortem for their consciousness to further develop?

    ReplyDelete
  3. @AY - I don't see things in that way. I guess we are (as individuals) incarnated into the kind of situation where we are most likely to learn what we - as individual souls - most need to learn.

    So it's Not (I think) a matter of how developed or mature our consciousnesses were pre-mortally.

    My understanding in this differs from Barfield (and Steiner) who supposed there were multiple reincarnations via which an individual spirit's consciousness would mature, and that the development of history reflected this maturation.

    In contrast, I believe that - since Jesus - we are intended (hoped) to resurrect and to stop reincarnating (or any other possibility). What we are supposed to learn in this mortal life is about "values" (to put it briefly), rather than about maturing our consciousness.

    The type of consciousness that we have innately is more like a kind of "given" - something that shapes and constrains our possibilities.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think I understand. By way of follow up, is an individual with a medieval consciousness permanently incapable of the sort of relationship with God that final participation entails? So, all men since Christ are meant to accept the offer of resurrection, but within those who do there are gradations of destiny depending upon the constraints imposed by the sort of consciousness they possess?

      Delete
  4. @Ron - I don't think it is "just a dream" as I tried to clarify in the Note added; but it is not a viable or desirable future state of society. If a serious attempt is taken to implement a society that depends on Medieval consciousness; but is instead peopled by those with modern consciousness - it will not happen; and some kind of corruption (sex, drugs, violence, despair, tyranny, parasitic behaviour etc) will divert the attempt to the bad.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @AY - No, you aren't understanding!

    We cannot infer anything about a pre-mortal spirit's level of consciousness from the time we are incarnated. Also, we cannot infer anything about a person's future potential through eternity from the type of consciousness reached in mortal life. After all, most people in history have died in the womb or as children.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hesitate to say I understand again and speak falsely! Thanks for the clarification. The first time around, what you said here didn’t sink in: “So it's Not (I think) a matter of how developed or mature our consciousnesses were pre-mortally.” I was thinking of it like an impersonal process of inexorable development with rigid, fixed categories.

      Delete
  6. "it is imperative we actively and consciously attempt to move our consciousness, and consequently our lives, forward into nigh unprecedented territory."

    It makes sense; if none of the options work, then try another option. Much more motivating than going along with techno-totalitarianism on the off chance that it turns into something good.

    I have never been able to figure out how ordinary people should put that into practice, though. People who don't have a creative project as a life motivation, nor have some sort of contemplative spirituality. On the one hand we are in an "individualistic" world, in that community is as weak as it ever has been. But on the other hand, it is more and more difficult to actually do anything as an individual because there are less and less niches where an individual can just exist. I guess people could be subsistence farmers in remote areas, some people advocate that, but easier said than done.

    I know ultimately, everyone has to figure out how to do it for themselves, but that's also easier said than done.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @NLR - It's not so much difficult, as something that people don't even try to do, and don't regard as important, and do not recognize as significant when "it happens".

    It's not a matter of changing one's life; more a matter of learning the many lessons that are continually presenting themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It seems that so-called new age activities: astrology, Wicca, magic, runes, etc are attempts to reach the level of consciousness that exists outside our normal consciousness, to make conscious what appears to be lost, to unify our fractured mind with our other side, the wholeness that is normally out of reach in daily life. Maybe modern psychology is also an attempt to get at that other reality which provides a sense of being with God, Spirit, all there is. Of not being left out of God's mind, being with it. There is some solace in these things but the wave of modernity often erases much of the fulfillment found. People must keep seeing, , keep paying attention. As you said, our personal mind, emotions, life is not our real spirit life. That lies outside our everyday conscious, just that recognition should lower the temperature of striving. We will in the spirit life realize what this is all for anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  9. @ag - Among the vast spectrum of what many Christians would call "New Age" are those few to whom I am indebted for most of these insights (Steiner, Dion Fortune, Barfield, Arkle, Gareth Knight).

    But most New Age teachers and consumers are either aiming at original participation - or more often to revive medieval consciousness by systems such as astrology, ritual magic, Tarot and so on.

    These are medieval/ classical - or quasi-ancient - objective/ systematic in nature, requires expertise, and purport or aim to be mediating to the spirit.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What are your impressions of the Gnostics? It seems many new age activities reach back even further than medieval times and into Egypt.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Before naturalistic explanations of the world were known by anyone but a skeptical and philosophically sophisticated intellectual elite, I think that most people believed in an omni-God who could and possibly would relieve this-worldly suffering if the believer prayed with earnest humility and was Good and pious enough. I personally knew many people who believed their apparently random misfortune in health and circumstances could be altered directly by God through prayer and faith. Yet, as technological advancements have disseminated naturalistic explanations for many previously inexplicable (in the minds of regular folk) phenomena, at the same time many bitter prayers for relief of human suffering have gone unanswered. People have witnessed their loved ones (and themselves) pass away in poverty, solitude and pain like a whimpering flame, and are now told by the remaining faithful that they must realize salvation and God's love comes post-mortally, after the destruction of the brain and body. That seems to me a harder faith to embrace than one in which Good things happen to Good people due to divine intervention in between our two eternities. An alienated and nihilistic development of consciousness seems like a natural result.

    ReplyDelete
  12. @ag - I have written a bit about "Gnosticism":

    https://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/search?q=gnostic
    https://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/search?q=gnosticism

    ReplyDelete
  13. @i - Any observations Can be explained in many ways - here, you are reversing my proposed causality.

    Such questions cannot be settled by facts, data, evidence etc.

    That is why metaphysics - i.e. primary assumptions - should come first, be known and stated first.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The timeline of these events is interesting. Sometime around World War 2 or the decade thereafter, it seems to have occurred to the top men and contracted psychiatrists of the Office of Strategic Studies, precursor to the Central Intelligence Agency, that the soul-invading and spiritual trespassing techniques used by psychopaths to control and torment people in their personal lives could be researched, codified, and scaled up to control and abuse entire national populations. These techniques were simultaneously applied in commercial mass advertising.

    If the entire populations of the West have been brutally and ritually abused for two or three generations now, perhaps the mere fact of surviving under such psychological conditions has produced a hardening or "callousing" of Western people's souls, such that God and the angels are unable to communicate with Western people through the gentle spiritual "osmosis" you call Original Participation.

    Perhaps we've endured such terrible trespasses that we are unable to experience proper awareness of more respectful and benign spiritual visitations.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @Epi - There are many explanations, such as this one, that make consciousness "reactive" and secondary to social conditions. And that is surely true to some extent.

    But I have come to conclude that the primary drive of social trends comes from changes in human consciousness - so I believe that it is changes of consciousness that comes first.

    It is a very big metaphysical shift to assume that consciousness primarily drives history - rather than the other way around, but I think it makes more sense of more things, in most ways.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated. "Anonymous" comments are deleted without being read.