What follows is meant to provide an historical analogy for a current real world situation - i.e. the Western proxy-war against the Fire Nation.
The Paraguayan War of 1894 was apparently one of the most destructive wars in history - in terms of the proportion of the Paraguayan population killed. Broadly speaking (because precise numbers are not known) more than half of the entire nation of Paraguay were killed, including nearly all men.
This happened because Paraguay was a small and relatively weak nation whose (apparently crazed or psychopathic) leader Lopez attacked three much larger and stronger surrounding nations (Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay) - simultaneously.
Despite this one-sidedness; the war continued for more than five years because Paraguay was not allowed to surrender.
It takes much longer to annihilate a population than to defeat a nation militarily.
When a nation is being used as a proxy by a superpower - an easy matter to do by imposing a superpower-puppet leadership by coup, and controlling them by bribery and blackmail - the proxy nation is in a similar situation to, but potentially worse than, Paraguay.
The proxy nation may be militarily defeated, but forbidden to surrender. Then the war can only end by annihilation of the proxy nation.
And conducting a war to the point of annihilation of the enemy, is bound to be far more costly and destructive even to the victorious side, than would be the case of fighting only to the point of military defeating the opponent.
Hence the appeal to superpowers of using proxies to fight their opponents, rather than doing so oneself.
Suppose then that the superpower has several further proxies lined-up and waiting in the wings; and who will be compelled to fight until each of these is also annihilated...
And suppose further that the superpower actively despised, resented, or otherwise hated the proxy nations...
This is why being a proxy nation used by a superpower may be worse than Paraguay.
I presume that the Paraguayan leader did not actually hate his people, and did not desire that they be annihilated - but those controlling a superpower may actively hate the people of the nation they are using as proxy.
The superpower may be glad that the the people fighting as their proxy, are being slaughtered en masse and their country ruined.
In this case, the annihilation of a series proxy nations used in wars against the Fire Nation would actually be a positively desired result!
Finally; we should add that a supra-national-globalist leadership class is actually controlling the geopolitical strategy of the West - this is a group without any national or other group loyalties, but instead motivated by a destructive hatred of all nations and peoples.
(A group, I would add, whose members are mostly in service to demonic powers, rather than pursuing human interests.)
Therefore, it is desirable for such a group that this planned sequence of proxy wars should also damage the superpower who is proximately contriving and conducting them.
What I am talking about is therefore a blueprint for incremental worldwide annihilation by mutual destruction.
Because, once lethal conflict has begun, then (so long as those in power remain in power) nobody will be allowed to stop and there will be no victory.
This business of contriving an unending sequence of unwinnable proxy-wars designed for mutual destruction is, I believe, the actual situation in the world today.
I assume that this fact is understood by at least some participants at the highest levels of geopolitical strategy - but most people in most places simply will not accept that things could possibly be as bad as I describe.
Time will tell.
5 comments:
B-but you mean that participating in the nationally-suicidal war in the name of democracy is not a best possible choice in the world!! ;(
@Ap - Sort of...
Lots of commenters describe things that way.
But what I really mean is that it's Much Worse than just that.
@Karl - Sorry, but I don't (as a rule) link to current mass media.
There's a real possibility that the former stand-up comedian and actor currently acting as head-of-state of the Ember Nation is actually the man in charge, and not merely a political puppet. I've observed this whole war and continue to be surprised by his inexplicable tenacity in retaining power, and that the whole might of Columbia and its president somehow continues to bend to his personal will and advantage, even if it means the death of every fighting age male in his country.
I don't know what to make of it - all ordinary theories of how the world works fall very short.
@Epi - That's what we are meant to think - it is a Punch and Judy show where the right and left hand puppets are set fighting (sometimes one seems to be winning, sometimes the other) - all so we don't think about the mind behind the puppets.
This isn't just a dreamed up theory. Brian Berletic at the New Atlas on YT shows how it is written in detail in some key policy papers, widely available, and published some years ago. "They" are following a script, and anyone can read it.
By that strange spiritual law; "They" are - it seems - compelled to tell "us" what they intend to do to us, before they do it; and they have.
Post a Comment