The problem with the most prevalent forms of mainstream, normal evil - such as the Litmus Test issues - is that they are invited into the heart; and once inside the heart they are regarded as good.
There are many incentives - immediate and long-term, psychological and social-material - for supporting the net-evil totalitarian strategies that I call Litmus Test issues; there are many rewards for support, and many sanctions against failure to support.
And when we inhabit a decades-old and pervasive-intrusive totalitarian ideology; almost all of public discourse is inhabited by one or another (or several - of all!) of the strategies of evil; such that it becomes all but impossible to survive and thrive without going-along-with one or many of the strategies of evil.
Such is the nature of the human condition in a world where evil is dominant; and where that dominance of evil reaches down into the detailed workings of (almost-) every significant nation, institutions, organization, corporation - and nowadays penetrates even into friendship groups, clubs, hobbies, and the family itself.
How can we inhabit such an evil world, without ourselves taking the side of evil in the spiritual war of this world?
The (Christian) answer is very simple, I believe; because it "simply" involves that we recognize evil, and inwardly reject that evil.
This recognition-rejection sounds easy, and it can be easy (a child can do it) - but in practice is apparently so difficult as to be not just impossible but incomprehensible.
One difficulty is that "we are all sinners", as the phrase puts it; that is to say, we all practice evil. This is unavoidable not just because this is an evil-dominated world, but because we ourselves can only sometimes and partially desire and live-in-harmony-with divine creation.
For much of our lives we cannot resist thinking, wanting, and doing evil.
Therefore, to recognize and reject evil entails that we recognize and reject many aspects of our-selves, and those whom we most love...
And also that we recognize and accept that this situation will not (because it cannot) change: for all of mortal life on earth, we are and shall-be stuck-with our own and other people's deficiencies and wickedness.
If the above is a broadly correct account of human life on earth; and if evil ought to be dealt-with by recognition and inner rejection; then we can see that it is a Big Problem - perhaps the biggest of all current spiritual problems - when people invite evil into their hearts and call it good.
Instead, we should strive not to invite evil into our hearts.
But when, inevitably, we do invite evil into our hearts - when we (inevitably) find ourselves supporting some evil strategy... then we must resist doubling-down on our sin, and calling that evil good.
We must, especially, resist defending intentional strategic evil; or promoting it on the grounds that is a lesser evil than something else; or on the grounds that - like all evil, everywhere, ever - the strategic-evil contains some good, or potentially good, aspects.
No - instead we must do that which is simple: recognize and reject.
And when - and it is a case of "when" not "if" because everybody is a sinner, all will fail and fall; and fail frequently... daily, hourly - we are compelled, or cannot resist, going-along-with or even publicly-supporting some evil strategy...
Then inwardly, in the privacy of our souls, we need to make a clear act of recognition and rejection.
Don't invite evil; and when we have already invited it into our hears; ensure that the evil does not become a familiar, habitual, acceptable, friend and companion.
Ensure instead that the evil we have already invited, accepted, and already supported in our hearts; then gets acknowledged and labelled in accordance with its true nature: as an evil we inwardly reject.
2 comments:
Crucial!
I sense most Christians will admit that they have evil inside (i.e. they are sinners, daily, consistnently); however, most appear to have a fairly limited understanding of what evil comprises, particularly when it comes to cultural/social/technical phenomena like AI and other Litmus Test issues. In fact, most seem to scoff at the idea that these are Litmus Test issues at all. I have seen some refer to them as purity spirals. At best, they regard them as neutral, which makes inward rejection of them well nigh impossible.
Even worse, some Christians will justify/rationalize the evil they invited in by citing virtues for it, i.e., taking the Peck/willfully promoting birdemic restrictions at my job was "obedience" and "love for my neighbor." Also, some will shrug at something like AI because their church is officially on board with the program -- hence, they are demonstrating faith in the prudence of their chosen authority, and so forth.
@Frank - Thanks.
It was different in past times and other places; but here-and-now the idea of listing (finite) categories of sins and virtues has become a serious problem.
The idea of Purity/ Holiness Spirals is itself a false explanation, based-on tendentious metaphysics:
https://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2019/11/more-on-false-concept-of-holiness.html
Post a Comment