The global Establishment "AI" project began almost exactly three years ago - with the multi-national, multi-pronged, coordinated mega-launch on 30th November 2022.
The "AI" project has, of course - like all such, tried to capture both of the side of the "debate" - by using some portion of its multi-trillion dollar budget to fund courses, qualification, conferences, books, and jobs; that purport to discuss the "ethics" of this technology.
Some of these "AI"-employees are techno-utopian apologists for "AI"; while others have the task of scaremongering.
"AI" scaremongering is done in such a way that the realities of this vast totalitarian project are obscured; and the categorically false assertions of "AI" are instead simply being-assumed to be true - by being used as the basis for the scaremongering!
In other words; the discourse variously called "AI ethics" (like the related field of "AI governance") is part of the PSYOPS that attempts (and successfully, it seems) to manipulate the masses into a state of bemused, terrified, passive and resigned acceptance of... whatever bad things "AI" brings.
Some of the "ethicists" base their "concern" on evaluations of what is coming - very soon!
These include assumptions that are smuggled in covertly, because they form the taken-for-granted basis of the ethical hand-wringing:
1. Inevitability
2. Takeover from humans
3. Destruction caused by the technology
The assumption of "inevitability" hides the unimaginable amount of trillions of tax dollars confiscated from the masses to fund the "AI" project - its massive computational infrastructure, the massive energy consumption, the countless reallocated and recruited "AI"-personnel in innumerable organizations...
And to bribe/force compliance upon all the major social institutions and corporations by a vast and coordinated program.
The assumption that "AI" will "takeover" from humans; hides that all actual decisions to (allegedly) "replace" people with computers, are made by humans.
That these decisions lead to takeover is because that choice is heavily propagandized, subsidized, driven by legislation changes.
Destruction: The assumption that this planned takeover of human activities by "AI" technologies will happen because of the technologies innate alleged-"power". Software is stated to be the cause of the inevitable (i.e. planned) personal and social damage.
This tries to hide that the whole process of "AI"-replacing has been driven and enforced, top to bottom, by people.
And this includes the common appeal to "market forces" and geopolitical competition, that supposedly compel corporations and governments to implement "AI" technology - or else be overwhelmed by those who adopt "AI"...
This assumes what is false: that "AI" really does or soon-will replace humans more efficiently and effectively in significant functional roles.
It also takes no account that the "market" for AI has been deliberately and artificially constructed by totalitarian fiat using, coercively-confiscated resources.
If the market had been orientated towards effectiveness and efficiency in achieving real-world outcomes; then it would not, indeed could not, have led to "AI".
So; the "AI" project serves to conceal and deny a vast program of (yes - inevitable! if the totalitarian Establishment get Their way) planned personal and societal harm; under cover that all this has been done "by the AI" - and in a way that is unstoppable and impersonal.
In a way that is nobody's fault.
No person or group is to blame for anything!
It All Just Happened..
(And "how sad", say the AIethicists...)
The lie is that this is not really people who are doing the destroying by means of a colossal organized and resourced international strategy; but instead it is the software that is doing this to us humans!
(When we suffer or die; we are meant to cry out from our hearts: "Woe is me, my heart bleeds! But what can mere Men do against such impersonal necessity?")
Behind the advertised ethical "concern" lies a raft of made-up, dishonest and propagandistic assertions about the functional efficiency and effectiveness of (post November 2022) "AI".
The truth of these assertions is another thing which is assumed, in the face of a complete lack of serious and honest evidence; and fundamentally rooted in the categorical impossibility of the claims.
My point here is clarify that those who are put-forward in mainstream discourse as "ethically concerned" by the "implications" of "AI" - including those who scaremonger on the basis of false assumptions concerning the technology's effectiveness and impersonal-inevitability - are themselves part of the coordinated AI-PSYOPS.
No comments:
Post a Comment