The UK mass media are censored and controlled - both openly and explicitly (eg. wrt the birdemic dissent, or Fire Nation news sites); and by news blackouts wrt mass immigration and its consequences.
And, of course, this censorship and propaganda usage of media is increasing rapidly in scope, completeness, and coercion.
There is a great deal of complaint in the alternative media about this - but the complainers are part of the problem.
The real problem is that people have come to rely on the mass media for basic information and understanding of the world and their lives.
If we need to be supplied by the mass media with information on matters of direct human observation and experience, and if we need to have its implications explained to us by the mass media - then we are already lost.
We are lost; because because we have handed-over responsibility for our fundamental understanding of the nature of things.
Even worse; we have chosen to hand-over responsibility for our basic assumptions and values to the worst possible external influence: to evil-motivated people, who work in corrupted and converged institutions/ organizations/ corporations that constitute the bureaucracy of an intrinsically evil totalitarian system.
(Evil in itself; and which is also in service to the agenda of demonic supernatural powers.)
Complaints that the mass media are censoring their output are dangerously misplaced - after all, what on earth do people expect from the mass media in the Western world as it is now?
Clearly, the complainers have grossly underestimated the pervasive extremity of evil as it actually is in the world now, and has been for many decades - and worsening.
It is not as if knowing more "news" about the horrendous corruption and us-hatred of the leadership class, has done or would make any difference to "their" aims and conduct - their desire to corrupt, torment, and spiritually-annihilate the nations and their peoples.
And it's not as if there are a great mass of good-motivated "ordinary people" who are being hoodwinked by media censorship, but who would otherwise compel significant and positive reforms in public affairs.
Ordinary people "know" (in the sense that the information has passed through their eyes and ears) all kinds of terrible stuff, more than enough! And/yet it makes no apparent difference whatsoever to their fundamental assumptions, world view, values, behaviours...
"Concerned" words are cheap, but human priorities tell a different story.
The Western masses are, even if much less evil as the leadership class; deeply complicit and accepting of major strategic agenda themes of the recent decades; and have a system of values that do not rise above the level of the farm yard (i.e. this-worldly hedonism, fear driven avoidance of suffering, addiction to convenience, and craving for continual distraction).
There has never, in the history of the world, been such shallow, trivial, and cowardly (because demotivated) people as there are in the West, now.
And if people need to be told something so invasive and everywhere - things we all know from observation and our daily personal experiences (and the observations and experiences of our direct social circle) - then clearly it is already too late.
So, what to do?
Forget about "effective political action", resistance, reform: that is absolutely Not a possibility, when basic understanding and proper motivation is so completely absent; when indeed the actuality is of a widespread and accepted social ethic of value-inversion.
From where we are as a civilization - spiritually and morally; all social action going forward must be net-evil. There is no source for it to be anything else.
We must first want what is good, or no good will eventuate.
Real understanding follow only upon proper motivation...
And then, when it comes to important matters, such understanding follows easily and swiftly.
To know and desire a human life based on good aims and conduct; we need-not, and certainly should-not, depend on anything produced by the mass media.
2 comments:
So true. The media ( news and social) are truly programing for persons. People seem more inert and dull than just a few decades ago. Relatedly, I find having to use my phone (or it uses me) for an increasing number of qoutidian activities very demoralizing, qui bono..
RJC - I don't actually have a smartphone, but if I was still working I would have had to get one to do the job. I'm reluctant because I've seen that the addictive quality is too strong for anyone to resist - at least everyone I've ever known who got a smartphone had their life seriously changed by it, apparently irresistibly.
Post a Comment