Sometimes the massive popularization of a term is symptomatic* of deep civilizational disorder: two instances are Life Hack and Bucket List.
Superficially these are harmless diversions - trivial rather than deadly.
The problem is in what lies underneath the pervasive chatter; the assumptions upon-which these terms are built.
A Life Hack is an instant, easy, short-cut or cheat; to deal-with some everyday problem of living.
The assumption of which this is a surface symptom, is that this is how Life ought to be dealt with.
A profound but concealed assumption of Life Hacking is that human Life consists of a multitude of discrete, immediate problems; and our job is to find the most efficient way to deal with these problems.
The implication is that our actual Life will incrementally and qualitatively be improved (ie. made more pleasurable, with less suffering) by implementing more and ever-more such Life Hacks.
The degenerate quality of Life Hacks; is that Life is the kind of thing for which we ought to be seeking quick and easy tricks - that Life is ultimately a set of problems of living that we need to solve.
So the best way to approach Life is to be armed with plenty of Hacks - applicable to the widest possible range of "challenges".
Life Hack attitudes and methods have, it seems, already taken-over student attitudes in formal education. Learning is just too slow, inefficient, and hard work. "Education" is now seen as a set of immediate problems, Tasks; for which the most effective approach is to have a tool-kit quick, easy short-cuts.
Also academic attitudes in "science". What gets called science nowadays has nothing to do with seeking or speaking truth. "Research" is all about Hacks to get funding, get the necessary results, get published, get cited and invited - get personal security, status and salary.
And Life Hacks are open-endedly extendible: For instance much Self Help, spiritual teaching of a New Age type, and including the "Manosphere"; is Life Hack thinking applied to human relationships, to love, marriage, family and friendship.
The same can be seen in discussions of religion. The Birdemic response of mainstream churches was that their religion was reducible to efficient and convenient Life Hacks; such as live-streamed and recorded "services" or sermons; and no-travel-required online interactions.
Bucket Lists derive from the idea that somebody is about to die - i.e. "kick the bucket"; and consists of a list of the things I most wish I had-done before I die.
As if someone is on the deathbed, looking back - and gaining satisfaction or plagued by regret over his accomplishments.
The underlying idea is that death is annihilation; and/but "therefore" a Good life is one in which we have done as many things that we "really want" to do, before the curtains come down.
A Bucket List is meant to be a public thing too; so that we can get status (and provoke conversations) by making public a Bucket List - preferably one that is suitably impressive to other people.
And then adverting via social media - or mass media if you are a "celebrity" - our progress in working-through that List.
You win the game by having an impressive-to-other-people List and completing the List: this is implicitly "to have had a Good Life".
Alternatively; people are invited to feel "sad" with you if, for some reason, you cannot or do not tick of an item - it terminal cancer prevents that bungee jumping, if an insufficiently supported "Kickstarter"-funding prevents you taking that African Safari...
This is implicitly to have had a "tragic" life.
Life Hacks and Bucket Lists are both degenerate fads because of their strategic dishonesty. And implicit evil!
Life Hacks are instrumental thinking.
They are predicated on "using" the world and other people for our own short-term ends, to fulfil our current desires.
If Life was the kind of thing susceptible to Life Hacks - Life would consist essentially of individuals efforts at learning tricks to exploit each-other; to get satisfaction at their expense.
Life would not be worth living.
And if Death was the kind of problem that could be In Any Genuine Way ameliorated by the successful completion of Bucket Lists, then death would not be final - death could not be an annihilation.
Because if Death is the end, then what we have done or not done in life makes no difference.
How we happen to feel about our previous Life, on our death bed, just about to die, looking-back -- would be utterly irrelevant; because dying would be just one temporary blip of emotion, among multi-millions of others - doomed to nothingness.
I
f after Death we will be gone utterly - then it cannot possibly matter either way whether or not we watched the sun rise, or set, off the Florida Keys.
Yet, if Death is not really the end; and we will survive in some form, to be affected in some way by our completion (or not) of Bucket Lists...
Then Life after Death is something that needs explicitly to be acknowledged, and its implications explored.
So yes; at one level these are trivial fads; "just" a harmless way of passing the time or having something to gossip about... Yet Life Hacks and Bucket lists are evidence of the deep, unacknowledged, and contradictory malaise of our civilization: of the ways in which we persistently refuse to think-through implications.
*A symptom is produced by the underlying pathology (in this instance, spiritual degeneracy); but a symptom is not conclusive evidence for the underlying pathology. So, you can have the pathology without the symptom, and vice versa.
5 comments:
I am no longer convinced that earthly death is final. I was never fully sure, but I leaned toward it being.
Now, I have genuine hope that I and other earthly beings may have a place in a glorious eternity.
Still: I want to partake in and contribute to creation while I am on Earth, not least of which because I suspect a creator behind the creation I love, and I love it, too, and want to give it gifts. I want to do as much good as I can during this chapter, and
I seem to sense that this is a good path, innate to my nature.
I don't fully disagree with your sentiment, but I can't honestly reject my belief that my mortal deeds havevalue, that I am on a quest, and can't that lead to a kind of list?
But the attitude and motivation behind my list is surely good
@Hagel - "I can't honestly reject my belief that my mortal deeds have value, that I am on a quest"
I agree; which is why I am not a Hindu or Buddhist or adherent to Oneness spirituality, but am a Christian.
Of course; motivations are primary; and of course I am making a generalization.
That generalization is that the motivation behind Bucket Lists is Not good, but is actually evil (or else Bucket Lists would not have been so heavily promoted long-term by the mass media - such discernment is not difficult!)
I don't know if you've seen the film the Bucket List, but the existence of an afterlife is one of the themes, and the film rather tilts towards the idea that there is one. It's a silly film, but I rather liked it.
Having said that, I also hate these two phrases. HATE them. Even before considering your own criticisms, they're so reductive. I think people always used to say things like: "I want to see Paris before I die". (It always seemed to be Paris, didn't it?) It was spontaneous, heartfelt, and quite tender. But "bucket list" makes it routine and prosaic, people just toss it off: "Oh yes, that's on my bucket list..."
As for "life hack", it's just a cliché. And yes, very instrumentalist.
@M - No I haven't seek the BL movie. I just thought the *poster* epitomized what I was criticising - two grinning (or gurning!) aged Hollywood womanizers; whose life ambitions include such stereotypical "youth" activities as riding a motorbike and parachuting.
I also find the actual things on BLs to be depressingly externally motivated - in the instances I have seen. What "other people" would find impressive and/or evidence that "what other people say" is the primary motivator in that person's desires.
One thing I do enjoy is the "Desert Island Discs" (or "Books") game; when somebody uses the opportunity to give credit to past influences, and provide a basis for overviewing the various phases or stages of his life.
My penfriend Andy Thomas did this the other day, selecting ten "DI" Books:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GOa2vDhnnU
Andy clearly was being honest, rather than trying to be impressive; and his second-choice book was the children's novelization of the TV series "Doctor Who and the Daemons" - which was one of the John Pertwee era storylines from the early 70s.
BTW: such choices can apparently be unintentionally revealing. I believe that - when she appeared on Desert Island Discs back in the 1950s or 60s; the (genuinely great) Dramatic Soprano Elizabeth Schwartzkopf chose eight records that were all featuring... Herself! That's a *real* Prima Donna for you.
I like that concept too. I'll enjoy listening to that.
Apparently in old age, the only books Hilaire Belloc ever read were his own, along with Diary of a Nobody.
Post a Comment