If you really believe that you personally are free, and you are a Christian; it follows that You Are Responsible.
You are not a communal being; you cannot evade your ultimate responsibility by claiming unawareness, or automatic habits; because such a claim gives-away the lie.
If you are responsible, then it is wrong to pretend otherwise.
It is wrong to pretend that you are not responsible because it is a lie: it is false, untrue.
And that's bad; because to assert untruth about reality is in an ultimate sense bad; i.e. self-damning.
To evade your actual responsibility is a denial of that responsibility. You are pretending to be unfree.
You are pretending that someone or some-thing else, outside you, is responsible for some-thing for which you are responsible.
You are falsely blaming.
Your freedom Just Is: its reality is not a valid subject for debate.
Although you might reasonably debate how it is that you are free, failure of a discussion to answer "how" freedom works, does not excuse you from the actual responsibility that the fact of your freedom carries.
To ask where your freedom comes-from, to ask who are what has "given" you freedom, is strictly nonsense.
(And we know it is nonsense, because we must each first choose to believe that our personal freedom was given us by X; and if we must first choose to believe...)
You can only be free because freedom is not given; you are only free because freedom is innate.
Because freedom is innate, then it is a fact, and it always-was and always-is a fact; even when freedom is not being used, even when actively being denied.
And we know freedom is real because nothing else can make sense.
The fact of our freedom - my freedom, yours, and every being's freedom - is built-into reality.
Since your freedom Just Is; it cannot be evaded by claiming that you must obey something external; because you have chosen that obedience.
To claim you must obey e.g. Society, God, or The Church does not absolve you of responsibility; because in claiming suchlike; you have, from your actual freedom, asserted some kind of obedience as superior to your freedom.
This is not just wrong (e.g. for the reasons above) but also incoherent.
It is simply a contradiction, not-sense, for a free being to deny his own freedom by asserting the superior authority of obedience to X; when the authority of X has been awarded and must continually be sustained by the freedom!
To pretend that you personally are not ultimately responsible is spiritually lethal, because it keeps your relationship with the divine at a distance.
You are choosing to interpose... Something Else - between yourself and the divine...
Consider - what Good reason could you have for doing that?
No Good reasons for choosing to separate your-self from God, but a variety of bad ones...
You may be denying the reality of God the loving creator - and pretending that this is a fact of necessary objective reality, when the necessary objectivity of that reality is your own choice. You chose to make that fact factual - how then can you validly give that fact your responsibility?
You may be pushing God away, pushing Jesus Christ away - interposing some-thing, and then pretending that you must just obeying this some-thing - when the authority of that thing comes from you, from yourself.
You can, of course, choose to carry on denying, evading, pretending you are not responsible.
And nobody can stop you! - because you are free and have thus chosen...
And have chosen to lie about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment