A comment I wrote at http://foseti.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/questions-for-the-secular-right - which may help clarify:
I’d like to emphasize that this is not really a matter of what *I* want, but of what we will get. And that I am thinking on a timescale of human generations (c. 25 year units), not of the next few years
I was profoundly influenced by the analysis of Ernest Gellner who (in brief) divided all human societies into:
1. the hunter-gatherer,
2. the agriculturally-based (dominated by warriors and priests, in various combinations), and
3. the post-industrial revolution modern societies – which depend on permanent growth (which means permanent increase in efficiency/ productivity – largely by increasing functional specialization and coordination).
When (and not if) industrial civilization collapses (and this will happen sooner rather than later, not least because the politically correct ruling elites want to destroy The West and they are clearly succeeding); The West will (like it or not) revert to the agriculturally based societies run by combinations of warriors and priests which existed everywhere in the world (except among a handful of hunter gatherers) before the industrial revolution.
Our choices are between different balances of warriors and priests, and between different types of priests.
The current default world religion is (obviously) Islam, not Christianity – due to its demographic growth and sustained assertive self-confidence.
It is on that basis that I prefer the Byzantine Christian Orthodox model.
But – more importantly – since I regard Christianity as true, obviously I believe that society should *at its bottom line* be organized around the need for Christian salvation; and not around the desire for comfort (maximum pleasure and minimum pain).
H/T to Isegoria - http://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/should-western-civilization-be-saved/ - (I had forgotten I had written this).