The reason I prefer blogging over writing books and articles is that argument is futile.
All arguments take so much for granted, make so many assumptions, that they can always be rejected by anybody - according to what that anybody pre-wants
If the argument is short and clear, then it can be rejected because it didn't mention abcxyz.
But if the argument is long and mentions abcxyz it will not be read, or if it is read it will not be followed, or if it is followed it will not be understood. And anyway it still misses-out alpha, beta and gamma.
All that can be hoped-for is to provide the missing piece that completes somebody-else's jig-saw.