Friday 9 August 2024

Richard Playne Stevens - the superpowered 1941 genius of night fighter interception


"Steve" Stevens beside his black painted Hawker Hurricane Mk I - credited by his biographer with 15.5 "kills" at night, without the use of on-board radar. He does not look like a nice person - and he wasn't .


I have a fascination with nightfighters of World War II - both the pilots and the radar-operators; and have read several biographies and memoirs of the species. 

Interception and destruction of enemy night bombers became highly desirable after the daylight Battle of Britain turned into the nocturnal Blitz in the autumn of 1940; but although the RAF made considerable efforts, there was essentially no success for many months; due the inadequate aircraft (the too-slow, feebly-armed, Bristol Blenheim) and the primitive on-board radar and inexperienced operators. 

It was only in the winter of 1940 when the fast and heavily-armed, two crew and two-engined, Bristol Beaufighter and better radar became available (and on-board radar expertise, and pilot-operator teamwork, began to develop); that the first successful interceptions began to occur from the exceptionally brilliant duo of John Cunningham and Jimmy Rawnsley. 


But from January of 1941 through to his death not-quite a year later, by far the leading nightfighter was Richard Playne Stevens, who flew the single-crew, single-engine, day-fighter the Hawker Hurricane. He rapidly accumulated "kills" - starting with two kills in one night on 15/16 January, and repeating a double on several more occasions. 

Stevens was instantly propelling into national heroic status with a Distinguished Flying Cross and Bar (i.e. awarded twice) followed by a Distinguished Service Order shortly before his death - The DSO being the highest award for operational gallantry in the UK, except the Victoria Cross.  

The extraordinary thing about Stevens is that he did not use on-board radar, but relied upon his truly exceptional - indeed apparently unique - night vision; combined with exceptional marksmanship. 


In the many accounts of the best fighter pilots from the first and second World Wars, this combination of attributes comes up again and again: exceptional eyesight and marksmanship. These were what, above all, set the aces (or Experten for the Germans) above the rest. 

So it is perhaps unsurprising that the best nightfighter pilot of this first year of the craft, was distinguished above all by the best night eyesight that anyone could remember. 

In late 1940, John Cunningham had been dubbed "Cat's Eyes" by the newspapers, because RAF propagandists falsely claimed that his early successes were due to exceptional night vision, in order to conceal the development of on-board radar. 


But this was not true: John Cunningham did not have exceptional night vision, and radar was essential for his kills. 

However, Richard Playne Stevens really did have astonishing "Cat's Eyes" ability to find, recognize, and destroy enemy bombers when nobody else could do this! His superb vision even extended to an ability to take off and land, and navigate, in appalling weather conditions of clouds and fog; conditions that grounded the rest of the RAF.    

It would not be too much of a stretch to say that Stevens eyesight was akin to the superpower of a comic superhero! - in the sense that his vision was qualitatively superior to everyone else, and it enabled him to do things impossible to normal people. 

As Cunningham himself said: "It was Stevens - and not me - who was unique in being the only really successful "Cat's Eyes" nightfighter pilot in the whole Royal Air Force".  

RP Stevens was also characterized by exceptionally-high, focused and sustained motivation to do that at which he excelled - he wanted to do that, and nothing else would suffice. 


It was my long term interest in the phenomenon of genius that spurred me to read the biography of RP Stevens - Lone Wolf by Andy Summers and Terry Thompson (2019). It seemed that RPS probably had at least two of the three qualities that I had identified as characteristic of the species: exceptional ability and motivation. 

I wanted to discover whether he had an "endogenous" personality - i.e. whether he was unusually inwardly-attentive and inwardly-dominated. Such an endogenous bias has, as an almost inevitable consequence, social consequences; caused by unusual indifference to other people and their feelings or approval.  

This abnormal psychology manifests variously; perhaps as "eccentricity", or even craziness ("psychoticsm"), or sometimes a psychopath-like selfishness and wilfullness. 

 

The biography revealed that Stevens was indeed an "endogenous personality". The title "Lone Wolf" reflects this - he wanted, indeed insisted, on working alone and doing what he wanted. 

At the time; this was uniquely possible for nightfighter pilots, perhaps above all other fighting military personnel. 

Probably, this is why I am so interested in WWII nightfighters: they retained the individualist and distinctive attitudes and behaviours that characterized many of the best 1914-18 war pilots.   


More exactly, it is clear that Stevens was an unpleasant and generally disliked person - going right back to childhood, through schooldays, pre-war work, and into the war: Friendless, tending to blame others, and with a cruel streak. 

As an extreme example, RPS put it about that his wife and children had been killed in the Blitz and that this had filled him with a consuming hatred of Germans and an obsessive desire to kill them. This was widely reported in the press and believed by his RAF colleagues and has been repeated in subsequent histories and memoirs; but it was not true. 

Instead Stevens had a wife and son who were alive, in Sussex; but completely ignored and never visited after the funeral of his beloved toddler-age daughter, who died in a household fire for which he apparently blamed his wife. 


Richard Playne Stevens is therefore an instance of something often seen with geniuses: that they are very difficult people to have around, and they seldom fit into the bureaucratic structures of modern society. 

If society wants the fruits of genius, then there is no alternative but to put up with their difficult behaviour and often unlikeable personalities. 

More than this, a genius must be allowed and sustained-in a niche, an unique environment and situation. In all the RAF it is likely that there was no other pilot who operated in the way that Stevens did; none who were allowed to do their own thing in such an autonomous fashion. 


Britain in the 1940s was the kind of place that enabled geniuses to survive, and indeed thrive. 

The result was that Britain got the society-wide benefits of a wide range of individual geniuses: those unique people who could do what nobody else could do

But Britain in 2024 is actively hostile to the genius type - with the consequence that any incipient geniuses are aggressively excluded from the influential and effective social milieu; and most potential genius achievements (which are typically dissonant with prevailing mainstream ideology) will be ignored: in fact suppressed.


14 comments:

NLR said...

Very interesting. I hadn't heard of Stevens before. That he was also able to successfully fly in bad weather and his marksmanship makes me think he also had a substantial ability to visualize where he was in space in relation to the other objects around him.

Stephen Macdonald said...

Many years ago I traveled to a hunting camp near James Bay, on the southern tip of Hudson Bay in Canada (quite far north). The guide was a wizened Inuit man who piloted our large canoe at 4:30am in what to my still-young eyes was absolute pitch darkness. Somehow he was able to traverse a river and cross miles of open water to get us to an island where we would wait for the flocks of geese to arrive. He had no instruments of any kind. To this day I don't know how he did it -- presumably with "Cat's Eyes".

John said...

From the behavioural traits and relationship indifference he may well have had Asperger's Syndrome. Also Aspies have abnormal vision to a greater extent than NTs. Usually this is observed as vision difficulties of course but enhanced vision may also be another divergence.

Trent Appleman said...

The importance of what you call an endogenous personality cannot be overstated, especially because this inward focus insulates them from whatever the prevailing toxicity of their host society happens to be as well as its intensity. Very social people get easily lonely and also wither if criticized or ostracized; in our situation, wherein our host societies are not healthy for us, this means that those who get lonely and wither under criticism are especially exposed to whatever toxin is in the air. They are like portions of the ecosystem more vulnerable to heavy metals.

"More than this, a genius must be allowed and sustained-in a niche, an unique environment and situation".

This is absolutely crucial. If we want orchids, then we had best be thrilled with the hothouses wherein they grow rather than rushing to change exactly those parameters which allow for the golden eggs. The inner imperatives produce the hothouse, and then the hothouse accelerates the production of orchids; it will frequently -- albeit within an infrequent phenomenon -- be found that those who fall into this category must by hypervigilant amid the development of their hothouses and their orchids, putting up if need be with "the meanest circumstances" (Schopenhauer's phrase).

It is notable that our host societies are willing to put up with any amount of obvious consequences from massive immigration; and yet do not extend their former tolerance to those who more deserve it, being both compatible with their host societies and essential to the advancement of these. If we want a renewed lease on life and prosperity -- especially in a broader sense than merely an economic one -- then this situation should invert.

It is precisely those who dwell in hothouses who are in the best position of any to produce a counter-narrative which is spiritually healthier and practically efficacious; so as to properly oppose the basket of unhealthy views being promulgated by the wicked in high places. One final point however: even those who hate the sick and twisted views being forced upon us as to lysenkoist and nonexistent climate and health emergencies are part of the problem; for they also have within themselves a bias against the very dwellers in hothouses who of their natures have the capacity to produce exactly the healthy notions and practices which throw a wrench in the gearworks of the destroyers. Even those who resent the evil all around us are apt to react negatively towards the very ones who might actually be efficacious because they unconsciously prefer the 'head girls' described in your joint book.

Bruce Charlton said...

@Stephen - Logically, I suppose there must be many non-pilots with superhuman night vision for every pilot with superhuman night vision. But I don't think I've met one. On the other hand, as a city dweller (where it is never truly dark) how would I know?

@John - You may be interested in this: https://iqpersonalitygenius.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-relationship-between-aspergers.html

@Trent - You make some excellent points.

A prime example of the spitefully aggressive way in which the modern West actively persecutes a difficult genius is James (DNA) Watson. Watson has since 2007 (https://medicalhypotheses.blogspot.com/2008/05/james-watson-affair.html) been, and still is being, slandered and tormented with a moralistic-sadism that is nauseating. Ed Dutton is writing a book about Watson, which I've seen in development, and he describes details of how the leftist-bureaucrats of "the system" are still threatening Watson into silence (for speaking unwelcome but correct facts).

Watson (who has many Asperger's traits, BTW) was chosen exactly because he is the most eminent living scientist - and therefore forms a chilling public example of how They will treat any genius who "steps out of line"... i.e. who behaves like geniuses behave.

Bruce Charlton said...

@NLR - I wrote a detailed reply to your comment yesterday, which seems to have been unposted or lost somewhere! But my comment's essence was Yes, you are right! There is considerable evidence that Stevens had exceptional 3D awareness of himself in relation to space, geographically, and in terms of his own aircraft's position relative to the enemy aircraft (which has much to do with his marksmanship).

John said...

Oops I added some more but submitted it Anonymously so it probably went into the ether but drawing on the genetic background of Asperger's as being Neanderthal admixture I referred to
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2013-03-13-neanderthal-brain-focussed-vision-and-movement which summarised as "Results imply that larger areas of the Neanderthal brain, compared to the modern human brain, were given over to vision and movement and this left less room for the higher level thinking required to form large social groups." and the paper discussed Neanderthals having vision for low light conditions of northern winters

Bruce Charlton said...

@John - Interesting paper, from authors I respect. But its too long a stretch for my liking to assume that Neanderthals have relevance to the business of Asperger's or exceptional modern night vision.

I tend to think Aspergers is a developmental disorder (which, like most disorders, has anti-fitness consequences on average) - and that the relationship with genius comes from the fact that creativity seems to be an unusual consequence of brain changes that are compensatory to pathology.

In "Sent before their time" - Ed Dutton has found a strikingly high rate of premature births and low birth weight among geniuses - when one might have expected a near zero rate. His idea is that the unusual "rewiring" that happens as a result of this stress, is sometimes (rarely, but sometimes) the basis of genius creativity.

Which is partly why geniuses are often strikingly lop-sided in their abilities, and have difficult personalities and other impairments.

This is only intended as a partial and reductionist contribution towards an explanations, but I think there is something in it.

Hamish McCallum said...

My father commanded a fighter-reconnaissance squadron in Germany in the 50s. One of the squadron pilots was Ray Hanna, who led the Red Arrows in the 60s and later had a considerable career in film/display flying. According to my father (who was no slouch himself), the precision with which Hanna could control the airframe in space and time was truly exceptional; but his shooting, even at stationary targets, was well below what was expected of someone with his experience.

Bruce Charlton said...

@Hamish - My impression is that good pilots have a realistic understanding of their weaknesses, as well as strengths.

I read one memoir of a WWII high scoring ace who was a superb pilot, but knew he was only a moderate marksman, and acknowledged that he failed to shoot down several enemy aircraft due to this deficit. My impression is that it was deflection shooting that really sorted out the best marksmen (i.e. knowing where to aim ahead and above, in order to hit an aircraft moving across from your line of fire).

The very best pilots-as-such often became test pilots, rather than being ace fighters - like Eric "Winkle" Brown who was a decent but not stellar fighter, but one of the very greatest of test pilots.

John said...

This story of RPS is illuminating. Like I posted before from his behaviours and relationship indifference plus his genius in his field he was very likely an Aspie. It is commonly remarked how Aspies think visually and this has been my rather extensive experience with them. Usually it is a metaphorical or rather corrspondential 'seeing' in the sense of 'I see' meaning 'I understand'. Michelangelo saw the figure of David in the stone waiting to be revealed. Terry Tao, diagnosed as Aspergic aged two and one of the world's current and all time great mathematicians sees the mathematical structures he then writes up. Ramanujan similarly saw his theorems before he wrote up their proof. To G H Hardy's frustration some times he could not prove his theorems. This RPS story suggests that he brought this faculty into the physical dimension even more so then Michelangelo did.

Bruce Charlton said...

@John - Good points. But the Asperger concept, which is of a developmental disorder, is a bad fit for something that is posited as a very long-term type of personality in human affairs. After all, it isn't an explanation, nor a pathology; but just the descriptive name for a medical syndrome.

If we want to use "Asperger's" as an explanation, rather than merely a description, then there must be some kind of hypothesized underlying functional aspect that leads to various outcomes - including pathological Alzheimer's.

In a way genius is itself a pathology - when regarded biologically and from the perspective of biological fitness; because genius greatly reduces fertility, on average - which means it is "pathological" to an organism. That's why some larger perspective is required - at the least group selection, or a fully spiritual one - in which genius is posited as divinely influenced, having an intended spiritual role in a society.

John said...

As an aside to the issue of marksmanship, later in the war simulators were created in large domed structures which allowed the RAF to rotate large numbers of recruits through and quickly assess their natural aptitude for deflection shooting. By filtering them out they significantly increased the effectiveness of air gunners.

Bruce Charlton said...

@John - Hadn't known about this - very interesting.