The way things work under a totalitarian demonic dictatorship is... instructive.
Those of us who have been the subject of politically correct witch hunts over recent decades, or who have friends or colleagues thus demonized, were given a vivid advance-experience of what everybody-in-the-world is now getting.
(Albeit, very few of the witch-hunted learned the right lessons, or indeed any lessons - then as now. Experience only favours the prepared mind - and in a materialist, leftist, atheist world - extremely few minds are prepared to learn from experience.)
Everybody-in-the-world has-been or will-be confronted with the decision of whether or not to accept the birdemic peck.
Of course - at some point, maybe soon - pecking may become mandatory and compelled; but the demons regard it as spiritually important that we consent to our own corruption (ideally we should embrace it, want it); so compulsion may not affect our spiritual decision.
Because to be physically-compelled to participate in evil, against one's spiritual judgment; and/but then to repent this - is in fact a victory for God.
The matter of the peck is confused by materialist expedience.
If pecking is avoided because of physical harm as such - this is not a spiritual decision but merely one kind of expedience - an expedience that values physical health above social acceptance.
So peck-rejecters might well be ultra-materialists, hence on the demonic side.
In sum; to be good, the peck must be rejected for the right reasons.
The peck is a unprecedentedly-massive illustration of the established facts that the social activities, the professional and powerful institutions of science and medicine are dead - having been incrementally absorbed into the single global bureaucracy over the past 50-plus years, and become systemically-dishonest. But even if they weren't dead; neither science nor medicine are grounds for existential decisions concerned with salvation.
So why not the peck? If material expedience should not be our priority, then why not go along? Why Not inwardly consent to the easiest, the mandatory, path?
Not many people will be able to avoid such a thought rising in their minds. And the 'why not?' question is unanswerable for many/ most modern Men - especially given the extreme cowardice and habitual dishonesty engendered by denial of God and the spiritual.
Is there any simple and clear answer to this deadly formulation of Why Not? Preferably an answer that does not require multiple assumptions and long chains of reasoning. An answer that fits with common sense human reasoning, and does not require expert knowledge of exactly what the peck may do, or is intended to do...
I think the best answer comes from knowledge of the spiritual war of this mortal world between God and evil; and the inference that those who advocate the peck are on the side of evil.
Once this is clear, then it is obvious that we should not do what They are very keen we should do.
We may not, probably do not, know exactly why They so-very-much want us to do 'it' (whatever 'it' may be); but (given their clear and sustained intent) we can be confident that 'it' will be for a bad reason and to cause us spiritual harm: tending towards damnation.
When dealing with evil people, that is with habitual and gross liars, it is often (in practice) impossible to establish what specific evil reason They are intending.
But whatever it is, we can be sure that it is evil; and is meant to damn us.
And that is all we need to know.